Most
often when I review a popular book I liked, I look to the negative
amateur reviews rather than raves. This is more so I'm not influenced
by the words and sentiments in the raves, such as “page turner”
or “tear jerker” or “really fascinating characters,” and the
like. I want the review to reflect my own reading experience, not the
viewpoint of others. The pans are usually good for a laugh, and they
often give me a starting point for my own assessment of the book.
I've
come to Wild
Swans
late, learning of it only recently from a friend who lived in China
awhile teaching English. Ordinarily averse to reading books others
recommend to me (probably an ego thing) this time it worked, in part
I suspect because my friend in describing some of the fascinating
revelations it contained tugged back the hem of a curtain I hadn't
realized was blocking my view of a land and a culture far beyond
anything I had imagined. Many of the handful of disappointed readers
bemoaned that Wild
Swans
didn't excite them, didn't have enough dialogue to suit their taste
for action. They compared the book to works of fiction or
fictionalized biographies. They must have missed the parts describing
the incomprehensible horrors the Japanese committed on the Chinese in
World War II, and then by the Chinese themselves in the subsequent
struggles for political control and ultimately by the prevailing
Communist Party and by the regime headed by Mao Zedong, a certifiable
madman
who relentlessly set his subjects against each other by the millions,
urging them to torture and beat each other to death and drive one
another to insanity and suicide.
I'm
surprised anyone who claims to have been bored by author Jung Chang's
descriptions of such horrific atrocities as "singing fountains",
in which Red Guards split victims' heads open to entertain onlookers
with the subsequent screaming and geysers of blood can read at all.
Or maybe they miss the dramatic foreground music that prompts them to
glance up from their cellphones in time to catch violent depictions
on their wide-screen TVs.
Jung
Chang builds her story, an account of China's tumultuous history
during the 20th century, around the lives of three generations of
women--her grandmother, mother and herself, the "wild swans"
of the title. Eventually allowed to leave her politically oppressive
homeland for England as a visiting scholar, she began writing Wild
Swans
after a visit of several months from her mother. Finally free of the
restrictions to talk about anything that might be perceived as
showing China in a negative light, Jung Chang's mother starting
telling her daughter things she'd bottled up most of her life. She
talked almost nonstop, even when she couldn't be with her daughter.
Jung Chang said her mother left some 60 hours of taped narrative
before returning to China. I could go on for pages describing the
horrors these women suffered and the incredible heroism they
displayed under conditions brought about by the most wicked behavior
the human species has ever displayed.
Jung Chang |
This
statement is bound to arouse suspicion that I'm a political shill or
at least am exaggerating beyond reason, but from reading Wild
Swans
I can say with complete confidence that Mao Zedong was a genius of
the most evil design ever seen on the planet. If only for the sheer
magnitude of Mao's murderous subjugation of China's hundreds of
millions, Hitler and Stalin were pipsqueaks in comparison. As Jung
Chang observed, Hitler and Stalin relied on elites and secret police
to enforce their totalitarian regimes. Mao cowed and brainwashed his
subjects with cunning, bringing out their worst instincts toward
service without question of his every whim. One consequence was the
starvation of millions during a famine brought about solely by Mao's
vanity and ignorance.
My
vague, naïve sense of China left me woefully unprepared for Jung
Chang's deceptively dispassionate revelations. Her straightforward,
uncontrived presentation, which has a diary feel at times, gives the
horrors she describes a poignancy that wrenches the heart. Not that
all is ghastly and bleak. Alongside the indelible image of the
"singing fountains" is her childhood remembrance of having
deliberately swallowed an orange seed. A family member had warned her
not to swallow the seeds or orange trees would grow out of her head.
She admitted having trouble getting to sleep that night worrying
about it.
I
prefer this memory to the other, although I know both will remain
ever with me.
Oh, Hitler and Stalin also had their millions of passionate followers, Mao his elite gangs...but Mao managed to outlast most of his similar colleagues...only a few totalitarians have had such a long run. I do have to wonder at anyone enjoying and expecting others to enjoy "singing fountains"--but public execution has been so sustained an entertainment over the centuries.
ReplyDeleteTrump being the current torch bearer in our bailiwick.
Delete