As
you may recall, Daniel Webster won his debate with the Devil after a
long, arduously cunning verbal struggle. Norman Mailer's attempt to
repeat the Webster victory, holding forth for the Existential
outlook, would have managed only a draw—had I finished the parody I
started in college and abandoned when understanding I'd actually have
to study Existentialism not merely indulge in its chemically induced
illusory semblance in order to give Mailer a fighting chance. I was
"chops challenged," as I learned to euphemize much later in
politically correct vernacular.
Comes
now something a tad more practical and, probably because of its
practicality, vastly more interesting:
A
debate between a snarky atheist midwife named Tessa Testerman and a
rather wimpy, guilt-ridden archangel named Maritenael,
a name Testerman can't pronounce, so changes to "Martin."
“No...Absolutely,
no,” Testerman instantly
responds,
interrupting Martin's description of a sacred relic he's ordered her to recover. The archangel had appeared to her after an
exhausting delivery. She assumes she's hallucinating.
The
angel stops speaking. He “resembled a generic Christmas tree
ornament, with a white robe, a gold sash, and angular features...trim
black hair and black eyes so focused they looked fierce.
"She
tilted up her chin to glare at him. 'You can leave me alone,’ she
says. ‘I’m not retrieving this relic. We’re done.'”
He
says, “This is the second time you’ve refused.”
“'Then
that makes both of us who can count to two.' Tessa folded her arms.
'I said no the first time, and I meant it.'”
She
accuses him of being a hallucination, and tells him to vanish, "or
whatever it is hallucinations do.”
Martin
insists he's real.
"Tessa
turned, hands on her hips. 'You’ve shown up twice, both times after
long births, both times at three o’clock in the morning. You didn’t
turn up at an hour when I’m not exhausted and high on someone
else’s birth endorphins. If that’s not a hallucination, then what
is?'”
Martin
admits she's more vulnerable after a delivery, "more willing to
accept the impossible."
“'And
that’s how I know you’re a hallucination,' she retorts. 'Now if
you don’t mind, I need to drive home without trees dancing
alongside the road. Excuse me, please.'”
He
blocks the doorway. Asks how he can prove to her he's an angel.
"She
huffed. 'If you’re really an angel, tell me the time of the next
birth I’ll attend, plus the gender of the baby.'”
He
does so, with precise details including an odd spelling of the baby's
name. Four days later Noe (pronounced Noah) is born as predicted, and
Martin reappears. Testerman acknowledges his angelhood, but she's no
pushover for harps and halos. Before allowng any game to be afoot,
the midwife has a demand of her own. It seems a bill is pending
before the state legislature that would allow insurance companies to
deny paying for birthing procedures not conducted in licensed
hospitals. Its passage would put midwives out of business. Therefore,
Testerman proposes,
if Martin would use his angelic powers to help defeat the bill, she
would try to find and recover the sacred relic.
Were
Dan Brown the author of Relic
of His Heart,
guaranteed, of
course,
to be another vehicle for Tom Hanks (this time presumably
in midwife drag), Testerman would abandon her husband and five sons
to hit the global airways gallivanting from one clue to the next,
dodging demons at every step, until at last she'd have the relic in
hand and could return home to her midwifery, safe from the
restrictive
legislation miraculously
defeated despite
the powerful hospital lobby,
and into the forgiving arms of her loving, mother-knows-best family.
Fortunately,
for me anyway, the author is Jane Lebak, whose lightly irreverent
sense of humor and joie
de vivre keep
a potentially grim, implausible, horror-riven thriller sensibly
grounded and morally sound yet irresistible. Not an easy thing to do
with an archangel co-protagonist constantly bouncing back and forth
in time who takes to heart quite literally the expression
“God-fearing,” reluctant as
he is
to approach the Father directly for
any reason, such as seeking
permission to reveal his own name to Testerman.
Martin
suffers celestial-grade guilt for having dropped the ball, so to
speak, when, during his tenure as guardian angel
of
the Church of the Holy Cross in Barlassina, Italy, soldiers, enraged
by an Italian partisan sniper’s shooting
at them,
burned the church to the ground and stole the relic, to boot. The
angel had been
off
attending to some other, apparently less important duty, and blames
himself for “losing” the church and the relic—a beautifully
designed golden reliquary containing a microscopic piece of the heart
of St. Peter of Verona taken from the tip of the assassin’s sword
that martyred him. Martin also blames himself for, at the same time,
not preventing a G.I.’s accidental fatal shooting of Testerman’s
Great Aunt Alicia. The relic must be returned to the town to appease
the two controlling, feuding families—the Monterosas and the
DiOrios—so the church can be rebuilt.
Testerman
is a DiOrio, which Martin counts on to spur her into hunting down the
relic. Fortunately her husband, Gary, is a freelance writer
enthralled by the situation, and researches that period for stories
he sells to national publications. Hey, this would be the part for
Tom Hanks, and he wouldn’t even have to wear a dress! The midwife’s
relatives contribute letters from family in Italy to help round out
the picture. One of Gary’s stories had the effect of kicking a
hornet’s nest in Barlassina. Threatening letters arrive, but one
tells him how carefully he’d balanced the story:
You
will be pleased to note that some of the smaller-minded among us
actually sat down and counted the number of quotes you provided from
the Monterosas versus the DiOrios, and they’re furious
that you made it exactly even.
Gary
tracks down those veterans still alive who’d been in the platoon
blamed for burning the church, shooting Alicia, and stealing the
relic. He gets the story and...no way will I reveal the secret of the
missing relic! That’s your job. Do Tessa and Gary actually go to
Barlassina? Of
course they do, but why and when and what happens when they get
there? Something else for you to wonder about. I won’t
have
the Monterosas and DiOrios sending me
any hate mail, grazi!
Thank you so much! I'm glad you had fun with the story. :-)
ReplyDeleteI'll be you had fun writing it. Helluva lotta research, too. Did you go to Barlasinna?
Delete