I
continually laughed aloud, mentally gasping, my third trip through A
Confederacy of Dunces,
as I recall doing the first two times. But this time was a little
different. I felt a kind of sadness riding along with the mirth and
astonishment. It wasn’t just that I knew the story behind the
Pulitzer-winning novel, that it didn’t get published until 1980,
more than a decade after its author, John Kennedy Toole, had killed
himself. I knew this the first two times, and probably felt a little
sad about it then, too. Maybe the
difference this time
came
from a closer
reading
of
Walker Percy’s foreword,
noting
his mention of a sadness that might have come as well “from the
tragedy at the heart of Ignatius’s great gaseous rages and lunatic
adventures...”
Ignatius J.
Reilly, the protagonist of this incredible novel, so famous today
there’s a bronze statue of him in front of the Canal Street
department store in New Orleans where the novel’s hilarious opening
scene takes place. We
meet Reilly
and
watch him provoke
a situation that quickly gets out of hand. Impossible
not to
appreciate Toole’s masterful comic orchestration. Yet, the sadness
Percy mentions seemed to hover all the while, almost hidden in the
background. Ordinarily I can’t help identifying with protagonists
in novels. I’d matured a tad since my last two reads of Dunces,
which
perhaps
explains why now I saw another Reilly beneath the flagrantly
brilliant buffoon of quixotic farce. A deeply pitiable Reilly. And
some of my sadness I’m sure came from empathy with the fictional
character because I share much if not most of the disenchantment with
modernity that drives his rage.
At
the same time I identify with central fictional characters I find
myself wondering how closely they might serve as their creators’
alter egos. In Dunces
it
was easy to
imagine Toole giggling and guffawing as he drew what Walker Percy
said were perfect caricatures of archetype New Orleans denizens. And
I imagined also some of Toole’s glee came from knowing
his writing was spot-on, great even, and that the validation of
literary success was awaiting him around the next corner. And my
heart hurt for him, knowing as I enjoyed the fruit of his creativity
and imagining his exuberance during the creation, knowing what lay
ahead instead:
the torturous frustration of waiting...waiting, until finally the
inescapable crushing reality of failure.
John Kennedy Toole |
Of the
various ironies in this heartbreaking backstory, perhaps the crowning
one is that the
woman who obviously inspired a main
supporting
character,
Toole’s manic mother, played a key role in getting Dunces
published. Thelma Toole hounded Walker Percy until he read the
manuscript, finding it “an incredulity:
surely it was not possible that it was so good,” he wrote. “I
shall resist the temptation to say what first made me gape, grin,
laugh out loud, shake my head in wonderment. Better let the reader
make the discovery on his own.”
As for this
reader, the gaping, grinning, laughing aloud and...well, I’ve never
shaken my head in wonderment, but I shall say straight out I executed
the other three tributes at the very get-go:
A green hunting cap squeezed
the top of the fleshy balloon of a head. The green earflaps, full of
large ears and uncut hair and the fine bristles that grew in the ears
themselves, stuck out on either side like turn signals indicating two
directions at once. Full, pursed lips protruded beneath the bushy
black moustache and, at their corners, sank into little folds filled
with disapproval and potato chip crumbs. In the shadow under the
green visor of the cap Ignatius J. Reilly’s supercilious blue and
yellow eyes looked down upon the other people waiting under the clock
at the D. H. Holmes department store, studying the crowd of people
for signs of bad taste in dress. Several of the outfits, Ignatius
noticed, were new enough and expensive enough to be properly
considered offenses against taste and decency. Possession of anything
new or expensive only reflected a person’s lack of theology and
geometry; it could even cast doubts upon one’s soul.
Read that,
and you know you’re off on one helluva weird and riotous romp—that
is, unless you have trouble digging into a novel that doesn’t have
a plot. But wait! Actually there are many plots, little ones, each
character has his or her own little plot, and they all seem to be
going nowhere, but, as Thelma Toole tells us in the hour-long film
biop of
the amazing Dunces
saga—which
you can load by clicking here--”they
all come together in the end!”
The supporting cast includes,
of course, Irene Reilly, the long-suffering, insufferable mother;
Patrolman Angelo Mancuso, a puny, sickly cop who spends most of the
novel in various undercover disguises trying to “catch a
character”; Myrna Minkoff, Reilly’s revolutionary, abusive
girlfriend; and Jones, a young black “in whom,” wrote Percy,
“Toole has achieved the near-impossible, a superb comic character
of immense wit and resourcefulness without the least trace of Rastus
minstrelsy.”
Here’s
Jones as a costumed doorman supposed to lure patrons into the bar
whose owner he hates and whose business he’s trying to sabotage:
“Whoa!
Come in, see Miss Harla O’Horror dancin with her pet. Guarantee one
hunner percent real plantation dancin. Ever mother-fuckin drink got a
guarantee knockout drop. Whoa! Everybody guarantee to catch them some
clap off they glass. Hey! Nobody never see nothin like Miss Harla
O’Horror Old South pet dancin. Opening night tonight, maybe this be
your one and only chance to catch this act. Ooo-wee.”
Maybe that’s the scene that
made Percy shake his head in wonderment. It is possible I even shook
mine a little, although I would hate to admit that here.
For years I
held the misconception Toole committed suicide because no agent or
editor would read his manuscript, which
for some reason I assumed was written
in pencil on cheap Big Chief lined tablets and smeared with stains
from food and unthinkable other things. I’d been confusing Toole
with his Ignatius
Reilly.
The real story is told in Joel Fletcher’s excellent account, Ken
& Thelma,
which explores the Dunces
phenomenon before, during and after.
Robert Gottleib |
Toole
wrote—on
a typewriter--most
of the novel while serving
as an
Army draftee in Puerto Rico teaching
English to recruits. He sent the finished manuscript straight to the
prestige publishing house Simon & Schuster. There
the eminent editor Robert Gottleib read it and wrote to Toole that he
loved it, but that it would need some editing. Toole complied, but
the manuscript came back with more suggestions for edits. This went
on for two years. Letters between the two in Fletcher’s book show
how grinding the process was, but how steadfast Gottleib remained in
defending the book. My impression now is that it simply failed to
excite the marketing wing at Simon & Schuster. Too weird, maybe,
too radical. Scenes like Toole’s erotic episodes in bed fantasizing
about his dead dog Rex (maybe that’s what got Percy shaking his
head—hell, alright, I’ll concede I might
have shaken mine a tad at that point.)
Meanwhile, the drinking habit
Toole tool developed in Puerto Rico grew heavy in New Orleans. The
last time a girlfriend from his college days saw him, not long before
his suicide, he was deeply depressed, she told Fletcher.
“It is a
great pity that John Kennedy Toole is not alive and well and
writing,” Percy wrote. “But he is not, and there is nothing we
can do about it but make sure that this gargantuan tumultuous human
tragicomedy is at least made available to a world of readers.”
[For
more Friday's Forgotten Books check the links on Patti
Abbott's unforgettable blog]
I have not read this, but you have succeeded in getting me interested. However I just bought a lot of books at a book sale and I don't think I am adding any more for a while. Great post, Mathew.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Tracy. This one's a classic. It'll wait until you're ready. ;)
DeleteYou say, and many will agree: Impossible not to appreciate Toole’s masterful comic orchestration.
ReplyDeleteNot for me. I found the novel painfully forced and broad, constantly jabbing in the ribs. The sadness and desperation came through for me on first and only reading, but the Hoo-Boy laffs never landed for me. But I'll grant you, it's much loved by most of its readers. Kurt Vonnegut, James Thurber, Peter de Vries, Bruce Jay Friedman, Nora Ephron, Jean Kerr it is not. Robert Benchley it isn't, but it isn't trying there.
I do seem to be in the minority here. I can live with that.
You're a SCOUNDREL, Todd Mason, and should be flayed and fed to the piranha! But I'm thinking now that maybe Toole drew Ignatius a tad too extreme, as there are some moments where a sense of tedium threatens. Perhaps it wants a moment or two of undiluted tragic relief from the sustained comedy. Then again, maybe the backstory provides those needed undertones.
DeleteI'm holding off on demanding the removal of the statue, to be sure...
DeleteThough I do wonder to what degree the backstory makes some others a bit more indulgent of the novel than they would be of the same book from happily continuing to exist James Suburban or Dave Loftdweller who was able to live a full three score and ten plus.
DeleteI wonder likewise.
DeleteA great comic novel. A great novel, period. Thanks for the review.
ReplyDeleteMy pleasure, Elgin.
DeleteI have not read this and I can't say why. I just haven't. I tackled it once or twice but there was something in the writing that threw me off. But I'm always willing to take another look and your enthusiasm has convinced me to try again, Mathew.
ReplyDeleteI know what that's like, Yvette. Happened to me with Moby Dick and with Gravity's Rainbow--kept trying with each over the years until finally I decided to hell with the dilly dallying around, and I slogged thru them both. I hope you give Dunces a try, tho, as I think once you get into it you'll find it easier going.
Delete