For as long
as I can remember I've harbored a vague (very vague) interest in
reading something by Georges Simenon, in particular the Maigret
series. But until last week I never went so far as to actually read a
word by him. I don't know why I put it off so long. I'm neither
Francophile nor -phobe. I have pleasant memories from long ago of two
stays in Paris for a couple of weeks each time, and I shared a room
with an extended family of cockroaches one night in Marseille. Maybe
some psychological clock’s been ticking all the while and the alarm
finally went off. Or it might have been the excellent review I read
recently of the very first Maigret novel—PIETR
THE LATVIAN—by
my blogging buddy Sergio Angelini, which persuaded me to read the
novel. I did, and was hooked. In fact I swallowed the hook.
Maigret is
the most engaging fictional police officer I’ve encountered. I had
a similar response to Arnaldur
Indridason's Inspector Erlendur in the two novels of that series I’ve
read. Both characters have what seemed to me an unusual capacity for
empathy—with victims and suspects alike—and a penchant for
introspection. Dogged in their pursuit of solutions to mysterious
deaths, both lean heavily on intuition, sometimes at the expense of
forensic evidence, and they’re not afraid to stand up to superiors
at risk to their careers. I confess to being more enthusiastic about
Maigret, most likely because it taps deeper into my psyche, reaching
that nearly buried personal French connection. I’ve never been to
Iceland.
I’ve
billed this report a twofer but have decided to avoid the
embarrassment of trying to compete with Sergio’s review, which I
highly recommend. You can reach it here.
Instead,
I did a little online sleuthing to see what I might find about
Georges Simenon and his creation:
Detective
Chief Inspector Jules Amédée François Maigret of the Paris Police
Judiciaire. I also scanned the Maigret novels listed on Amazon, and
found, to my delight the title MAIGRET’S
FIRST CASE,
which I devoured after promptly downloading it onto my Kindle app. On
the heels of reading Simenon’s debut Maigret, I imagined the fun he
must have had some thirty episodes later taking us back to meet his
star character as a rookie police officer, and it fascinated me to
see the embryo of a full-blown, nearing-middle-aged Maigret in the
wet-behind-the-ears youth of twenty-six.
Most of
the traits we see in the wiser, more experienced Maigret are evident
in the younger version. "Maigret,
more than any other detective with a ream of adventures under his
belt, rarely solves crimes; instead, he solves people,” writes
Scott Bradfield in a NYT Sunday Book Review piece titled TheCase of Georges Simenon.
"Maigret
rarely has to search hard for clues, Bradfield continues, “they are
constantly occurring all around him, like the casual altercations of
people in crowds. In fact, Maigret’s chief talent doesn’t seem to
be genius, or method, or physical strength, or even hard work —
rather, he’s simply interested in people, and why they behave the
way they do…
"Simenon slowly abandons
all the traditional, manipulative nonsense of mystery and crime
fiction, and allows his middle-class, relatively conventional hero to
roam freely above and beyond the dull, self-constrained lives of
murderers (and their victims) that inevitably become, for him, all
too human, all too believable and no more “guilty” of anything
than just about everybody else."
And yet,
there’s something substantive—heavy, even—about Maigret, a sort
of ambulatory Nero Wolfe whose authority suffers no compromise from
the candor of his sharing doubts and introspection with us.
Suspending disbelief, as I always try to do when reading well-written
fiction, I never doubted in either novel the plausibility of
Maigret’s intuition as he pondered the culpability or innocence of
people he was investigating. As to the plotting, with only two
Maigrets under my belt I am hardly qualified to take issue with
Bradfield’s opinion that the early novels are “far
from the best” in the
series. He pronounced Pietr
the Latvian a
“crude initial effort” (a tad harsh, in my opinion), and dissed
the next several as “rather gimmicky Agatha Christie-style
whodunits.” I shall reserve judgment until I’ve read the next
Maigret on my to-read list, the series’ second, The
Late Monsieur Gallet.
Simenon’s skill with Maigret
comes through to me even with my scant familiarity with the series.
Two scenes contrasting from the first novel with the first case (30th
or 31st
novel) emphasize the distance in time on the character’s
development. This from Pietr,
in which Maigret is confronting the socialite wife of a
multi-millionaire who’s gone missing:
‘Well now! Is that how you
conduct a manhunt?’ she said to Maigret. ‘I’ve just been told
you’re a policeman … My husband might have been killed … What
are you waiting for?’
The look that then fell upon
her was Maigret through and through! Completely calm! Completely
unruffled! It was as if he’d just noticed the buzzing of a bee. As
if what he had before him was something quite ordinary.
She was not accustomed to
being looked at in that way. She bit her lip, blushed crimson beneath
her make-up and stamped her heel with impatience.
He was still staring at her.
Because he was pushing her to
the limit, or perhaps because she didn’t know what else to do, Mrs
Mortimer-Levingston threw a fit.
And this
from the young Maigret, who is following up a complaint from a
musician who claims he heard a woman cry for help from the second
floor of a mansion, and then heard a gunshot after it appeared
someone had pulled her away from the window:
In those days, Maigret was
almost as thin as the flautist, so skinny that as they walked up the
road they looked like two raw-boned adolescents...
The situation was actually
rather alarming. As he raised his hand to ring the bell, Maigret felt
his chest tighten, and he wondered which regulation he could invoke.
He had no warrant. Besides, it was the middle of the night. Could he
really claim a crime had been committed when his only evidence was
the flautist’s swollen nose?
Like the musician, he had to
ring three times, but he did not have to kick the door. At length a
voice called out:
‘What
is it?’
‘Police!’
he said in a slightly tremulous voice.
Of
the many minor characters in this novel, one stands out so
prominently as to compete with Maigret for memorability. He’s a
petty criminal known as Dédé, an audacious hedonist with charm and
seemingly unrestrained appetites. Made me wonder if Simenon used him
in other novels, perhaps even making him a bestselling novelist. From
Scott Bradfield’s little retrospective in The New York Times, one
could get the impression Dédé and his creator would have gotten
along quite infamously.
[For
more Friday's Forgotten Books check the links on Patti
Abbott's unforgettable blog]
First off, thanks for the kind words Matt! And second, a new Simenon fan if born, hurrah! He's not for everyone - just lent one of his best (MY FRIEND AIGRET) to a PAL and she is clearly not going to make it to the end! But Simenon was a writer of substance and I think this comes through over and over, though I think the almost stream of consciousness style (it's not really that but is so internalised as to sometimes seem that way) can put some off. Me, I love it!
ReplyDeleteWe're on the same wavelength, Sergio. I probly won't write any more about them, but they're such quick reads I can squeeze a couple in between my regular FFB contributions.
DeleteI've read several Maigret novels, Mathew, and to my surprise, enjoyed them all. He is uniquely himself and no one else if you know what I mean. I discovered Maigret in an anthology I dug out of a bin of free books at Bouchercon in Las Vegas once upon a time. For whatever reason I, too, have never read anything by Simenon. Little by little, I'll be reading more.
ReplyDeleteI could almost hear the concertina and Edith Piaf in the background as I read these, Yvette.
DeleteI read a good number of books by Simenon when I was younger, most of them about Maigret, some stand alone books. I remember liking them. I have a good number on the shelves, and I should definitely read some of them. As you note, they are so short it isn't a huge effort. I am glad you enjoyed these so much.
ReplyDeleteI wish I had started reading him sooner, Tracy.
Delete