My love
affair with Walker Percy has only just begun, despite my having
read—at least once--everything I could find that he wrote and
that's been written about him. In the early days of my acquaintance
with Percy, several decades ago, I even bought a cheap park bench and
sprawled on it langorously from time to time under our pecan trees,
trying to feel like he looks in one or more book jacket photos and in
many Walker Percy magazine features. I probably should not have
disclosed this pathetic fact, and surely wouldn't have were it not my
intention to impress upon you how deep and lasting an impact Percy
has made on my psyche.
I believe I
read his first novel, The
Moviegoer,
first. If so, I have no recollection of whatever or whoever prompted
me to read it. I've since read it twice more, each time finding so
much more in the writing it was as if I was reading it again for the
first time. Some years went by after that actual first reading before
I read another of his novels, this time recommended by a friend. It
was either The
Last Gentleman
or
Love in the Ruins.
This was years ago. Of all the other Percy works besides Moviegoer,
Ruins
is the only one I've reread. As with my rereads of Moviegoer,
while I found Ruins
familiar the second time around, I saw much I'd had no inkling of
before.
Percy’s
novels are layered with meanings that start at the top level with a
male narrator and his immediate crisis. Before
long, pursuing a resolution to his crisis, he takes us down the
elevator through levels of social malaise and its
philosophical/Christian interpretations. Percy, who had joined the
Catholic Church, considered himself a “wayfaring” Christian,
which was a mix of philosophy and faith. I came to understand this
more by reading about him than reading his novels, but with the
rereads thus far it’s obvious his wayfaring search for a satisfying
life based on belief in the New Testament is very much a part of the
fabric of both novels. In Ruins,
which has an added satiric layer, there’s even an obvious Devil
character. Percy balances absurdity with a commonplace surface feel
of
moving
through perilous
terrain with signs everywhere pointing to darkness ahead. The opening
scene of Ruins
kicks things off and sets the tone:
Now in these dread latter days
of the old violent beloved U.S.A. and of the Christ-forgetting
Christ-haunted death-dealing Western world I came to myself in a
grove of young pines and the question came to me:
has it happened at last?
Two more hours should tell the
story. One way or the other. Either I am right and a catastrophe will
occur, or it won’t and I’m crazy. In either case the outlook is
not so good.
Here I sit, in any case,
against a young pine, broken out in hives and waiting for the end of
the world. Safe here for the moment though, flanks protected by a
rise of ground on the left and an approach ramp on the right. The
carbine lies across my lap.
Just below the cloverleaf, in
the ruined motel, the three girls are waiting for me.
Undoubtedly something is about
to happen.
Or is it that something has
stopped happening?
The
psychiatrist narrator is a “collateral” descendant of his
apparently coincidental namesake, Sir (Saint) Thomas More, the 16th
century lord high chancellor of England executed by order of Henry
VIII for refusing to acknowledge Henry as supreme head of the Church
of England. At his execution, More reportedly said, "I
die the King's good servant, and God's first." Dr.
Tom More, immobilized by Satan incarnate Art Immelman, calls upon his
ancestor to banish Immelman as he approaches More’s secretary Ellen
to make off with her:
“’Don’t
touch her!’ I cry, but I can’t seem to move. I close my eyes. Sir
Thomas More, kinsman, saint, best dearest merriest of Englishmen,
pray for us and drive this son of a bitch hence. I open my eyes.
“Art is turning slowly away,
wheeling in slow motion, a dazed hurt look through the eyes as if he
had been struck across the face.”
More holds Ellen tight as they
watch Immelman vanish into swirling smoke.
Immelman’s the cause of the
catastrophe More awaits in the beginning of Love
in the Ruins. Having appeared mysteriously and affixed
himself seemingly to More’s every move, he has subverted More’s
invention—a brain-scanning diagnostic tool—by affixing a
treatment element he’s using to arouse people’s basest desires.
More fears Immelman’s misuse of the tool over the deep salt
deposits under the local golf course will release a heavy sodium
cloud from which “an unprecedented fallout of noxious particles
will settle hereabouts and perhaps in other places as well.
“The effects of the evil
particles are psychic rather than physical,” More tells us. “They
do not burn the skin and rot the marrow; rather do they inflame and
worsen the secret ills of the spirit and rive the very self from
itself. If a man is already prone to anger, he’ll go mad with rage.
If he lives affrighted, he will quake with terror. If he’s already
abstracted from himself, he’ll be sundered from himself and roam
the world like Ishmael.”
As to More’s apocalyptic
fear, I can tell you that, yes, all hell does break loose at one
point in the complicated, politically, religiously, and socially
fragmented community where the story is set. Looking back five years
later, these days would be referred to as The Trouble. All is not
well five years later, though, and we leave off with Dr. More married
to one of the “three girls” holed up in the ruined motel, living
contentedly and working to enable his diagnostic tool for curing
spiritual ills instead of turning people into beasts.
Sort of a happy ending, it
would seem, at least for More, but with Percy’s obligatory ominous
overtones for the rest of us.
Love Walker Percy. Does anyone read him today.THE MOVIEGOER was genius to me and he never looked back.
ReplyDeleteMaybe we can start a revival, Patti. I'm reading all of his novels again. For next week, I'm thinking Thanatos Syndrome, which got panned, but I remember liking it. It's essentially the sequel to Love in the Ruins. I'm taking a re-look at Lost in the Cosmos, but I think he got a little too carried away with the self v. self argument--a little too Kierkegaardian for my liking. Besides, as you know I'm a secret romantic. ;)
DeleteWell, I've never read Walker Percy, but to judge by your enthusiasm I should have. So I've added THE MOVIEGOER to my TBR list and we'll take it from there.
ReplyDeleteI know you'll like it Yvette. I forgot to mention it won the Natl Book Award. His first novel!
DeleteThe Moviegoer is on my list of classic books to read. I have other books by him, so maybe I will read more than one. Your enthusiasm is a motivator, for sure.
ReplyDeleteI've just started The Thanatos Syndrome, Tracy, supposedly the weakest of his novels. It's the sequel to Love in the Ruins. I remember liking it, despite its frowny critical reception, when it came out. I'm liking it thus far now.
ReplyDelete