I was in
West Germany in 1964 wearing a headset and listening to Morse code
day and night when Jane Langton's first Homer Kelly crime novel hit
the streets in the U.S. of A. Had I learned of it somehow, I couldn't
have cared less. I was reading Norman Mailer for recreation back
then. Had I been prescient, of course, I might have known somehow
that fifty-five years and
seventeen more Homer Kelly novels hence
I would fall in love with the novel Ms. Langton had written for me,
unwittingly, of course, unless she
was prescient. As I am too skeptical of the idea of prescience to
feel comfortable with that explanation I must resort to crediting
pure happenstance if not its loftier cousin cosmic convergence for
the blessed union of me and The
Transcendental Murder—with
a celestial
introduction,
I am delighted to add, by friend Tracy at her blog Bitter
Tea & Mystery.
Lest my
enthusiasm seem a tad extravagant, let me emphasize with some detail.
Let's see, ah, it has a glorious murder, one I myself would have
loved to commit, as would many of the other characters who knew the
malevalent,
hateful
victim and thus
had
righteous motive, which, with
ample
opportunity and the obvious means, could have performed the deed. There’s a
second
murder, presumably executed by the first murderer, which trims the
list of usual suspects and paints the murderer with a hue nearly as
heinous
as that of the first victim, having the effect of switching
sentiments from congratulating the perpetrator of the first murder to
wishing him/her extreme punishment for the second.
A pause here to note that the
first murder is by 60-caliber flintlock-propelled lead ball, while
the second is by marble bust of Louisa May Alcott hurled from a
balcony unto the victim's head.
With that
I've given you another detail! History, both military and literary,
joined in present day lethal mischief in—yet another
detail—Concord, Mass., during a span of several cruel mid-April
days commemorating the grand inception
two centuries prior of our country's glorious, painful birth. And
there's romance! Undeclared
for most of the book but understood by everyone else, between two
tall people:
the literary cop who scoffs at Concord as “a polite little suburban
pest-hole, living on its picayune history,” but is enchanted by the
riveting eyes of the town’s assistant librarian whose
infatuation—nay, deep, abiding love—is reserved for the
long-deceased Concordian favorite son Henry David Thoreau.
Thoreau |
And there
are yuks.
One that almost took the wind out of me was undoubtedly the
consequence
of a mischievous auto-correct feature in preparing the novel for this
Mysterious
Press
revival, unless the culprit is the typist who no doubt is still
in the stocks in some proper New England town enduring well-deserved
public shame.
Should you happen to be reading this in a public place, you’re
advised to restrain yourself when reading the following, copied
directly (I’m leaving sic
off the questionable word to obviate confusion as to who might have
wrought the
sic-warranted
noun)
from the Kindle text:
“The
lanyard men stuck
their long pricks
in the touchholes to free loose powder from the powder bags
inside...”
Picks,
I presume. Else I’d have to say those artillery reenactors were
better men than I, in perhaps more ways than one (I
always
make a point of approaching touchholes prudently).
Blazing touchholes at Concord Bridge |
Good Lord, where were we? Ah
yes, the plot—or plawt as I imagine “Old Concords” might
say. Anyway, the plot--as we shall spell it--bursts into cacophonous
lethality when Ernest Goss, the primary victim-to-be, reads a series
of titillating love letters between members of historic Concord’s
august society, including Thoreau, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Mrs.
Ralph Waldo Emerson, Louisa May Alcott, and Margaret Fuller, which he
claims to have obtained mysteriously and intends to publish. The
setting is a meeting of the Committee on Public Ceremonies and
Celebrations Relative to the 19th of April Ceremony (a celebration
called Patriot’s Day involving a parade, speeches, and reenactions
complete with the firing of Colonial era cannons and muskets).
Goss ignites vastly more than
powdery touchholes when his pompous voice lets fly with the first
letter:
My dear Waldo,
Oh, thou, other half of my
thought, other chamber of my heart! Thou the castle’s King, I the
Queen! Long have I waited in the dust to behold thy golden litter! At
first I feared thou wert cold, but now thou hast raised me to reign
in full-orbed glory beside thy infinite majesty! That thou shouldst
have worshipped poor Mignon’s body as well as her soul transports
her humanity to heaven’s height. O, what rapture in Mrs.
O’Flannigan’s back sitting-room! O, divine divan! I am chosen
among women! And thou, O sage, hast a Queen for thy Soul-wife!
Lilacs
perfume the air with ecstasy.
Margaret
But what of Lidian, who
shares thy earthly home? Would a more transcendent honesty veil from
her the dazzling light of Truth, lest it bring pain upon her lower
nature?
Emerson |
Oh, the horror, the horror,
the Old Concords responded, with their gasps, their voices, and their
shocked, jerking body language and glaring visages. There are more
letters, more shocks, more hoots, cries, and raging faces. Enough
enmity to get Goss got right there in Orchard House, home of the
Alcotts.
Fuller |
Suspects in his shooting death
following the Patriot’s Day festivities also include his family.
He’d laughingly shot one of his two sons in the leg with a musket
ball, and deeply humiliated one of his daughters at a reception in
his home, and there was a sense of estrangement with his wife—I
would have thought because metaphorically his general conduct
suggested the personality of a hemorrhoid, but we are told the head
librarian, Alice Herpitude, knows a deep, dark Goss family secret.
[one of the things I especially love about The Transcendental
Murder is a listing of the
principal characters at the beginning,
each with a little hint of their persona and role in the story.
With Mary Morgan, the assistant librarian, for example, we have
“Concord? Mary would never have said as much out loud, but she felt
herself walking on holy ground. (Looking at her, Homer found himself
mumbling a phrase by Thoreau, ‘The eye is the jewel of the body.’)
Homer? This would be Homer Kelly, the cop/history buff and namesake
of Langton’s eighteen-book mystery series.]
Lidian Emerson |
Jane Langton |
Jane Langton? You would have
to ask. Wikipedia tells us she was born in Boston, had a couple of
master’s degrees, and lived in Lincoln, Mass., near Concord,
joining her ancestors last Dec. 22. I mourn her loss, and intend to
read more Homer Kelly mysteries, for the history, the romance, the
cleverly executed mysteries, and the humor—hers. The typist’s in
this book was a bonus.
[For
more Friday's Forgotten Books check the links on Patti
Abbott's unforgettable blog]
What a lovely review, Mathew. I am very glad you liked this book. I wasn't sure, the series doesn't appeal to everyone. How could I have forgotten about the romance? Now I want to go back and read this one, but I think I must move forward in the series.
ReplyDeleteThanks for linking to my post.
Thanks, Tracy. I like to start a series at the beginning, and especially glad I did this one. I went back and reread yours of, I believe, the 7th in the series, and saw they're now married and teaching at Harvard. Their courtship was nicely done, with Mary detesting Homer but still finding him attractive--the way it so often happens in life. Langton was a superb writer!
Delete