Here's how it feels to
disappear: "The tunnel, we called it. At the beginning
you are straight, and at the end you are underground. A long, clean
passage away from everyone who knew you, unnoticed and unremarked. If
it works right, absolutely nothing happens, and yet, at the other
end, you are in another world. Your legal identity is changed. Your
appearance is changed. And because there are no witnesses to either
transformation, you are, now, literally, someone else."
Sounds fun,
easy. And it's safe to assume Neil Gordon knew what he was talking
about when he wrote The
Company You Keep, considering
he had help from such iconic members of the '70s Weather Underground
as Bernardine Dohrn and Bill Ayers, as well as those "who spoke
to me, with such generous honesty, on condition of anonymity."
These heavyweight sources along with his characters' intimate
references to such highly publicized events as the Days of Rage in
Chicago and the Greenwich Village Townhouse Explosion, bring a
viscerally authentic feel to Gordon's imaginary story. The
Company You Keep is a cornucopia of
hard-proven survival tips:
how to manage fear and panic, and distinguish between the two, how to
run, how to hide.
It seems more than
coincidental that the story itself brings to mind a particular event
in which two Weather members—Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert--were
given lengthy prison terms for their roles as getaway drivers in the
1981 Brink's robbery in Rockland County, N.Y., in which two police
officers and a security guard were killed. They left a 14-month-old
son, Chesa, to be raised by Ayers and Dohrn. Gordon also acknowledges
Chesa, a former Rhodes scholar and now a public defender attorney in
San Francisco, for his contributions to The Company You Keep.
It may appear to some readers that Chesa Boudin's contributions were
more significant than those of any other to the central story.
Chesa Boudin |
The novel unfolds as a series
of emails to Isabel Montgomery, the 17-year-old daughter of a man
known ten years earlier as “Jim Grant,” a civil rights attorney
in Albany, N.Y. Grant flees, leaving Isabel with relatives, when a
local newspaper reporter stumbles onto his true identity: Jason
Sinai, a Weather fugitive of nearly thirty years, wanted as a getaway
driver in a bank robbery in which a guard was killed. Sinai goes
underground again, this time to find and persuade his former Weather
girlfriend, Mimi Lurie, also a fugitive from her role in the robbery,
to surrender and clear him of the charges. His alibi? He skipped the
robbery and was delivering their baby to friends to raise while he
and Lurie went their separate ways with new identities.
Ayers and Dohrn |
Now, ten years later, Sinai,
Lurie, their close associates and the reporter are giving Isabel
their accounts of these fugitive years in the hope of persuading her
to return from England to testify in Lurie's parole hearing.
The
email scheme is arranged so each member of the group receives each
email at the same time Isabel receives it in England. This allows for
various often contradictory accounts to be told without interference.
It's an effective literary device, as well, enabling Gordon to
revisit that dangerously contentious decade of ideological and
political passions. To this end, two questions dominate:
Ayers and Dohrn |
1
– Did the fight matter?
2
– When all boils down to essence, which value stands above
the other, truth or love?
Gordon's
characters continue their impassioned debate nearly forty years
later. The tone has matured, as have the ideas that drove them.
Sinai's reflections to his
daughter struck me as the
most poignant:
In
a bar in Dexter, remembering with drunken clarity the rage that had
animated me a quarter century ago when I was barely older than you
are now, and the freedom I’d glimpsed, one day, in this same bar.
It was that I couldn’t stand the roles available to me. I couldn’t
stand it:
doctor, lawyer, professor, politician. Living and dying in the
compromises of my parents. Nothing that was available to me in my
parents’ expectations could offer me a way out. I could make more
money, I could have greater exposure. I couldn’t, however, be any
more involved than they were, nor could I be any less of a phony.
Unless I got
out. [...]
I
had been waiting too long, I knew. I had been drinking too much:
after years of not drinking, the beer was buzzing in my ears, and my
vision had the clarity of real drunkenness. And yet it was there,
sitting in this bar in Dexter, that for the first time in twenty
years and more I remembered what it was we had fought for, what it
was we had risked our lives and even worse, made fools of ourselves
for. It was for this feeling: this feeling of clarity, of courage, of
strength—of freedom.
And
this, to
the reporter who outed him, merely for a story--objective, but
privately leaning toward sympathy:
You know, Benny, it was the
best dream we ever had. That these motherfuckers could be made to
stop. That the machine, the corporate machine, the government
machine, the war machine, that it could be turned off. That real
rights of real people could come before money. That ecology could
come before corporations. It was the best dream we ever had, ever,
and it put us in the same company as all the other people around the
world who had the same dream; all the people who’ve dreamt the same
dream in all the history of mankind. From the very beginning. [...]
Our government has rolled over
that dream, every single day since the sixties. Every single day it’s
gotten worse. The poor are poorer, the rich are whiter, and the world
is a worse place than it’s ever been before. [...]
It
was the best dream any of us ever had, and that it failed, Benny,
that the machine rolled on over the poor and the blacks at home and
all Latin America and Africa and all of the people who so detest us
abroad, it didn’t have to happen that way. [...]
All we ever asked them to do was to practice the fundamental
principles of constitutional democracy, like they always said they
would. And that they wouldn’t…it’s so sad, I can’t tell you.
As to the question of truth v. love, these discussions play out between the genders—Sinai and Lurie debating whether to abandon an admittedly futile fight against “the machine” so he can raise his child; the reporter and the Republican woman he's come to love. Gordon's characters don't go preachy here, wielding Plato or Christ or Socrates or Buddha or Vonnegut or Lennon or Dylan or...you may join in here if you like. He lets the reporter, the pushy, nosy, cynical, smartass reporter, have the last word on this one:
“Truth or love? Fuck truth.”
I haven't read this but the film adaptation isn't too shabby, if a bit over-earnest (might be one of few watchable Shia LaBeouf films ever to happen).
ReplyDeleteI saw the film first. It takes only a fragment of the story to make it mostly a procedural thriller, but the cast and acting are excellent and, frankly, I enjoyed it so much it took me to the book.
Deletefeel like expanding this with an appreciation of the film, as well? I could slip that into Overlooked A/V...
DeleteWould tomorrow be too late?
DeleteFor someone who was around (and old enough) in the 70s and the 80s, you would think I would remember more about this period. And know about this book, which I did not. I definitely need to read this. And then see the movie. Thanks, Matt.
ReplyDeleteI was in the same boat, Tracy, altho being a student in Wisconsin then I did get caught up is some of the radical war protests. I think you'll enjoy both. I just now published a review of the movie--right above this review on the blog.
DeleteAll this is absolutely unknown to me. Now off to google about it. Thanks Matt.
ReplyDeleteYou must be one o' them whippersnappers, neer. You're in for an interesting history lesson!
Delete