Terrible cover. At first
glance, a cutesy black cat sandwiched between a so-so title and an
unknown author, all on a plain blue-green background. Pfui, as Nero
Wolfe would say. My eye wouldn't even pause on it scanning an airport
kiosk's books in the hope of finding something to take my mind off
the terror of hurtling through space in a supersonic tin can with
suicidal religious nuts as potential fellow passengers. Fortunately I
don't have to fly anymore, and I am doubly fortunate that one of my
new literary advisers, Yvette
Banek,
sold me on the author in one of her reviews for Patti Abbott's
Friday's Forgotten Books
blog feature. Yvette reviewed the third book in this ten-book series,
which features archaeologist Ruth Galloway, and, as I've secretly
regretted not pursuing a career in archaeology ever since I saw
Raiders of the Loast
Ark, I
walked my fingers to
Amazon, scanned the series list, and one-click downloaded the one at
the top. It didn't hurt that what I'd thought was a cutesy black cat
on the cover is actually an ominous black owl, and, I subsequently
learned a "Rare Long-Eared Owl", does in fact come into
play in The
Crossing Places.
The novel opens with police
asking Ruth Galloway to look at some bones found in a remote salt
marsh in the remote county of Norfolk on the North Sea. Galloway's
not done forensic work before, but, teaching at nearby North Norfolk
University and living on the edge of the marsh, she was a natural
choice for Norfolk's Chief Inspector to get a fix on the bones, which
appear to be those of a child. Galloway quickly determines the bones
are too old—2,000 or so years in fact--to be of police concern. But
Chief Inspector Harry Nelson has told her he'd thought maybe they
belonged to a little girl who'd gone missing ten years ago. Nelson
tells Galloway about the weird letters he's been getting about that
case displaying knowledge of archaeology. He enlists Galloway's help
in deciphering the letters.
Romance, I soon began
suspecting. Galloway's single and Nelson marriage is not a happy one.
But both are cautious on that front—Galloway fearing she's too
overweight to be attractive and Nelson reluctant to be the one to
break up the family. They have two children.
Here's Galloway after first
meeting Nelson at the college, about to drive to the site of the
bones: "Ruth climbs in, feeling fat, as she always does in cars.
She has a morbid dread of the seatbelt not fitting around her or of
some invisible weight sensor setting off a shrill alarm. ‘Twelve
and a half stone! Twelve and a half stone in car! Emergency! Press
ejector button.’"
Elly Griffiths |
And now Nelson ponders his
impression of Galloway: "She interests him. Like all forceful
people (he calls it forceful rather than bullying), he prefers people
who stand up to him, but in his job that doesn’t happen often.
People either despise him or kowtow to him. Ruth had done neither.
She had looked him in the face, coolly, as an equal. He thinks he’s
never met anyone, any woman, quite as sure of themselves as [Dr.]
Ruth Galloway. Even the way she dresses—baggy clothes,
trainers—seemed to be a way of saying that she doesn’t care what
anyone thinks. She’s not going to tart herself up in skirts and
high heels just to please men. Not that there’s anything wrong with
pleasing men, muses Nelson, kicking open the door to his office, but
there’s something interesting, even refreshing, about a woman who
doesn’t care whether or not she’s attractive."
Nearly forty and with no
mating proxpects in sight, she's nonetheless able to laugh at herself
(silently), "By now I have resigned myself to spinsterhood and
godmotherhood and slowly going mad, knitting clothes for my cats out
of my own hair." Yet, the chemistry with Nelson seems to be
taking hold. Her inner cat sharpens its claws when she sees him with
his wife: "Michelle certainly looked attractive enough, a
definite prize for a man who is letting himself go a bit, a man who
doesn’t look as if he has a gym membership or spends more than five
pounds on a haircut." But then she zeroes in on Michelle,
deciding Nelson's wife looks "like a woman who knows her own
worth, as if she knows the value of her good looks and how to use
them for her own purposes. She remembers seeing her laughing up at
Nelson, her hand on his arm, soothing, cajoling. She looked, in
short, like the sort of woman Ruth dislikes intensely."
Pfffffffff!
Oh,
it's simmering, no missing that. But the boil's a ways off, at least
in The
Crossing Places.
I would assume, though, that if these two continue working together
throughout the series something will be bubbling out of the kettle
before too long. Meanwhile another little girl from the same
neighborhood has gone missing, and Chief Inspector Nelson's still
getting spooky letters, and, of course, Ruth Galloway's on this case,
as well.
She's everywhere, she's everywhere! |
The
things I like about the book are, first off, the characters. Running
a close second is the archaeology with its remnants of a prehistoric
culture and its myths. And right on its heels comes the bleak,
Norfolk salt marsh setting. Author Elly Griffiths, says The
Crossing Places,
her first crime novel after four books with an Italian setting, grew
out of a holiday she spent in Norfolk with her
husband, had recently
given up his city job to study archaeology. "We were...walking
across Titchwell Marsh," she says in her webpage profile, "when
Andy mentioned that prehistoric man had thought that marshland was
sacred. Because it’s neither land nor sea, but something
in-between, they saw it as a kind of bridge to the afterlife. Neither
land nor sea, neither life nor death. As he said these words the
entire plot of The
Crossing Places
appeared, full formed, in my head and, walking towards me out of the
mist, I saw Dr. Ruth Galloway."
I
found the narrative voice authentic and engaging, especially the
interiors, the silent thinking and reflections. The writing is solid.
I stumbled a little at first getting used to the English country
idiom, but regained my footing with only a graceful skip to cover the
embarrassment. Plotwise, The
Crossing Places
has crises and suspense galore. I had a pretty good idea quite soon
who the murderer was, but there were enough red herrings to keep me a
tad off balance and to hold the suspense where it belonged—several
times I found myself on the verge of shouting NO!
For God's sake don't!! I
didn't utter a sound, though, but only for fear a neighbor might call
911.
[For
more Friday's Forgotten Books check the links on Patti
Abbott's unforgettable blog]
So glad you enjoyed this, Mathew. So now I'm your 'literary adviser' - too much responsibility!! Ha. I'm really enjoying this series as it moves along, the setting especially is like nothing else out there plus Griffiths writes quite well. As you know, I'm not a big fan of the contemporary mystery/thriller anymore but when I stumble across a good one I hope I know to stop and take a look.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the tip, Yvette. Have Ruth and Harry become an item yet?
DeleteI did not like this first book in the series as well you did. I have trouble reading novels written in present tense for one thing. But I have read the 2nd one and enjoyed it and I have the third book in the series. I do like the characters.
ReplyDeleteYour review is very entertaining. And the cover. The cover on the book I read was better, sort of, more atmospheric. A sea shore.
I like that cover better, too, Tracy. It was with the initial, British, edition. I noticed other people in the customer review section bothered by the present tense. I did when I first confronted it years ago, found it forced and confusing. But I've gotten used to it now. For me it adds a sense of immediacy that works especially well in a suspense narrative. (Glad you enjoy my offbeat review style. I sense many readers find it self-indulgent, but it's the only way I can get up enough enthusiasm to review a book at all.)
DeleteAt first glance, I thought it was a cat too:) Glad you enjoyed it, Mathew.
ReplyDeleteI still have to look twice to remind myself. Hooot hooot hooooo...
Delete