Had I any inkling Agatha
Christie was this good—the humor, the characters, the crafty
plotting, the...I'll think of more, trust me—I would have started
on her gargantuan canon ages ago. Ages ago! Mrs.
McGinty’s Dead is only my third Christie—and my
second Hercule Poirot, and I’m so so far behind, just thinking
about it makes me feel verklempt.
Hercule Poirot. What a
character for a detective! [That’s two exclamation points. I’m
allowing myself five for this report.] I said in my report on The
Orient Express that Peter Lorre would have (and might
have) made a terrific Poirot. And what a switch that would be, Poirot
slapping Sam Spade around and Spade liking it! [two more] But there’s
no Sam Spade in Mrs. McGinty’s Dead, alas, but it was fun imagining
Spade eavesdropping while Poirot’s saying this to himself:
“It is my weakness, it has
always been my weakness, to desire to show off...But indeed it is
very necessary for a man of my abilities to admire himself— and for
that one needs stimulation from outside. I cannot, truly I cannot,
sit in a chair all day reflecting how truly admirable I am. One needs
the human touch. One needs—as they say nowadays—the stooge.”
Spade, of course, would have
thought Poirot considered him the stooge. Oh, the fun. Who
gets slapped versus who deserves to get slapped...but in this
instance Poirot is thinking about his friend Hastings, “My first
friend in this country— and still to me the dearest friend I have.
True, often and often did he enrage me. But do I remember that now?
No. I remember only his incredulous wonder, his openmouthed
appreciation of my talents— the ease with which I misled him
without uttering an untrue word, his bafflement, his stupendous
astonishment when he at last perceived the truth that had been clear
to me all along.”
As I was
reading this I had a sudden urge to slap him myself—Poirot,
that is, and then realized he was only a figment of Agatha Christie’s
bathtub-conjuring
imagination.
What fun she must have had with what at least one of her characters
describes
as
a
“ridiculous-looking
little man. The sort of little man one could never take seriously.”
And she
turns the unforgiving spotlight on herself! [last one] She appears
thinly disguised, one presumes, as Ariadne Oliver, here describing
how she loathes one of her
characters:
“‘How do I know?’ said
Mrs. Oliver crossly. ‘How do I know why I ever thought of the
revolting man? I must have been mad! Why a Finn when I know nothing
about Finland? Why a vegetarian? Why all the idiotic mannerisms he’s
got? These things just happen. You try something—and people seem to
like it—and then you go on—and before you know where you are,
you’ve got someone like that maddening Sven Hjerson tied to you for
life. And people even write and say how fond you must be of him. Fond
of him? If I met that bony, gangling, vegetable-eating Finn in real
life, I’d do a better murder than any I’ve ever invented.’”
[watch out, Poirot! (exclamation points don’t count in brackets)]
And here’s a confession:
“What a mistake for an author to emerge from her secret
fastness. Authors were shy, unsociable creatures, atoning for their
lack of social aptitude by inventing their own companions and
conversations.”
Yup. An authentic ring, for
sure. Poor shy, unsociable Dame Agatha—somehow that doesn’t
ring so true. Ah, well, on to the puzzle.
Poirot has just gotten home,
having walked from a “dingy little” French restaurant he’d only
just discovered, where he’d enjoyed a superb meal—a big deal, in
fact, for him: “‘The truth is,’ Poirot reflected as he
turned his steps homeward, ‘I am not in tune with the modern world.
And I am, in a superior way, a slave as other men are slaves. My work
has enslaved me just as their work enslaves them. When the hour of
leisure arrives, they have nothing with which to fill their leisure.
The retired financier takes up golf, the little merchant puts bulbs
in his garden, me, I eat. But there it is, I come round to it again.
One can only eat three times a day. And in between are the
gaps.’”
Anyway, when he arrives home
George, his “manservant,” greets him at the door and informs him
he has a visitor. Poirot discovers it’s Superintendent Spence of
the Kilchester Police, with whom he’d worked evidently some while
in the past. Spence’s conscience is bothering him. He’d
investigated a murder that led to the conviction of a man who was now
two weeks away from the gallows. Despite fairly obvious
circumstantial evidence against the man, Spence has a nagging
suspicion he’s innocent of the killing. He wants Poirot to re-open
the investigation in the hope that if someone else is guilty it could
be proven in time to save the condemned man from hanging.
The victim, of course, was
Mrs. McGinty, a cleaning lady, and the man convicted of splitting her
skull open was her roomer. But of course Poirot takes the case, and
of course… It starts out simply enough. Poirot takes a room in the
small community where Mrs. McGinty had lived. He gets to know people
there, focusing on those whose homes Mrs. McGinty had cleaned.
Remember, he has a two-week deadline to find the real murderer, or at
least find new evidence tightening the rope around the roomer’s
neck and putting Supt. Spence’s conscience to rest. I needn’t
tell you things get complicated. Even more complicated than The
Murder on the Orient Express, which I reported on last
week (without telling you just how complicated it was—discussing
plot details is not my thing, as I’m always afraid I’ll
inadvertently tip the author’s hand and spoil the ending—same
thing could happen here, despite the complexity of the backgrounds of
Poirot’s, and our, suspects). But for those of you drooling over
the prospect of one helluva good murder-plot puzzle, trust me, Mrs.
McGinty’s Dead won’t let you down. Actually, the plot
is so complicated I’d have to read the novel again just to make
sure I had everything straight enough to give you a spoiler-free
synopsis, were something of that sort even possible.
What I can do, and am quite
willing to do, is to reveal Poirot’s strategy in trying to shake
loose information from residents of this small community who do not
share Supt. Spence’s pang of conscience. They believe the jury that
convicted the roomer had no choice based on what was apparently
irrefutable evidence. Poirot let it be known to everyone with whom he
spoke, that new evidence had come to his attention. The idea was that
if the killer was still at large, he or she might get nervous and do
something revealing. Poirot counted on his reputation to enhance this
effect. Yet, when he introduces himself to his temporary landlady at
the guest house where he’s staying, she, Maureen Summerhayes (a
redhead—Christie’s had one in all three of her novels I’ve
read) is not impressed:
“‘I should, perhaps,
madame, tell you a little more about myself. I am Hercule Poirot.’
“The revelation left Mrs.
Summerhayes unmoved. ‘What a lovely name,’ she said kindly.
‘Greek, isn’t it?’
“‘I am, as you may know,’
said Poirot, ‘a detective.’ He tapped his chest. ‘Perhaps the
most famous detective there is.’
“Mrs. Summerhayes screamed
with amusement.”
No longer amused, is she,
when Poirot finally gathers all of his suspects (including her) in
her guest house to reveal his solution to the puzzle. But first we
see him at perhaps his most vulnerable:
“‘I get nowhere—
nowhere,’ said Poirot to himself. ‘There is nothing— no little
gleam. I can well understand the despair of Superintendent Spence.
But it should be different for me. Superintendent Spence, he is a
good and painstaking police officer, but me,
I
am Hercule Poirot.
For me, there should be illumination!’ [...]
“He was the great, the
unique Hercule Poirot, but he was also a very old man and his shoes
were tight."
But now, with the suspects
gathered together, Poirot plays his hand: “A new note crept
into his voice. He was no longer a ridiculous little man with an
absurd mustache and dyed hair, he was a hunter very close to his
quarry.”
And so, the murderer of Mrs.
McGinty is… Mwaaaahahahahaaa...
[For
more Friday's Forgotten Books check the links on Patti
Abbott's unforgettable blog]
I love this book too, Mathew. It is a keeper. SO brilliant. And you have to especially love how Poirot puts up with all the awfulness of Maureeen Summerhaye's house where he is forced to take a room. HA! But eventually he teaches her how to make a perfect omelette so ALL is not lost. For a man who disdains disorder, staying at the Summerhayes house is pure torture - huge dogs walking in and out of the house, blood in the string beans. Poor Poirot.
ReplyDeleteFortunately she's a good-natured redhead (is that an oxymoron, Yvette?) Old man with tight shoes--Dame Aggie knew how to give us character.
DeleteMathew, loving your 'discovery' of Christie.I have forgotten this book. Seems I must re-read but with an overwhelming TBR pile, seems virtually impossible. Ah well! I read it once:)
ReplyDeleteA couple of years ago, I made a list of my favourite Christies and others contributed too. Have a look, if you are interested:
http://inkquilletc.blogspot.in/2012/01/twelve-best-agatha-christie.html
Thanks, Neeru, I'll do that, altho I'm too early in the game to be able to contribute anything to the list!
DeleteFabulous review. I'm tickled to death (well...not quite death) to learn that you enjoyed this book just as much than I did. Probably more than I did judging form the enthusiasm in the review above. I've read this one twice and I will probalby read it again because frankly it's my favorite of all her books. It has all of her strengths on display -- great humor, intricate plotting, and one of the best surprise endings, at least from her mid career books. You quoted all my favorite parts, too. Like minds! Maureen is a true highlight in this book, one of Christie's funniest characters. And of course an appearance by Mrs. Oliver always heightens any Christie mystery. She's also in Cards on the Table, Dead Man's Folly and ...one more that I can't remember. I seem to recall she shows up in a Parker Pyne short story, too. You might want to check those out next. Or Death on the Nile or Murder in Mesopotamia which gets my vote for Agatha's most audacious denouement and is her best murder-at-an-archeology-site book. She wrote about four of those when she was travelling with her archeologist second husband, Max Mallowan.
ReplyDeleteMy thanks to you for the kind words and for recommending McGinty, John. Not sure when I'll get back to Christie, but when I do I probly will take your advice again and read Murder on the Mesopotamia, as I've always had a fascination with archaeology. Hope you had a feasty Thanksgiving!
DeleteI have been reading these in order of publication but now you make me want to hop ahead (by about 14 books). I know order doesn't matter in this series except that occasionally she does spoil an earlier book.
ReplyDeleteI read a lot of Agatha Christie books when I was young, and then avoided them until about 6 or 7 years ago. I too was surprised at all they have to offer.
I'm too old to try to do them all, Tracy, in or out of order. Just going to do some cherry picking based on recommendations from the FFB Team!
DeleteI do understand, Mathew, there are some series I will never finish, but I am sure I am as old as you are.
DeleteDunno about you, Tracy, but I've reached the age when I forget my own birthday!
Delete