I’ve
never liked coming-of-age novels. Not sure why. Maybe because
I was coming of age myself when I tried those that I tried. I was
probably pre-high school when the first one I remember, Catcher
in the Rye, appeared on my radar. I might have read it. I know I read some of it.
I recall not liking the snarky voice nor empathizing with Holden
Caulfield.
Then
came The
Adventures of Augie March,
assigned in my freshman English class at U. of Wis. Hated it,
narrator way too smart for me, reminded me painfully of my Midwest
smalltown hickness. Haven’t tried it again, although recently I’ve
read Bellow’s more mature work and liked it despite its informing
me my hickness, alas, will be evident to anyone who cares to look for
it as long as I live. But I believe it also helped me reach a sort of
peace with it--oy, what a clever aging boyhick am I!
A Separate Peace.
I doubt I would have liked it had I tried to read it nearer the time
it was published, 1959. For one, its language was too fine, too
nuanced for my callow hickness. Nor would I have had the incentive of
the publicity blast Catcher caught eight years earlier with its catchy (groan) title and
forbidden-fruit flavor aimed at rebellion-itching adolescents. I’d
seen references to it over the years, always with praise if not
outright awe, and believe I might have bought a copy awhile
back--quite awhile back--intending to pursue the promised
enlightenment. I did pursue enlightenment during those days, and
continue to pursue it (and hope to chase it to the end of my
cognizance), but somehow neglected to seek it in John Knowles’s
debut and universally acclaimed coming-of-age novel. The
“coming-of-age” aspect might have been off-putting had I known of
it. I realize now I had no idea at all what A
Separate Peace
was about.
I
read it last week on the trusted recommendation of my literary
adviser, the Fictionaut poet Kitty Boots, and I can say with
unequivocal enthusiasm her record with me stands intact. So I bought the
Kindle version, and right off felt vindicated for my Catcher
distaste by this endorsement from the British newspaper The
Independent:
“A
coming-of-age tale set in a New England boarding school, it bears
immediate comparison to its better known contemporary The Catcher in
the Rye but is an altogether gentler, more quietly brilliant book. .
. . Reading this novel will feel like unearthing a forgotten gem.”
So
I scrolled down to the first paragraph:
I went back to the Devon
School not long ago, and found it looking oddly newer than when I was
a student there fifteen years before. It seemed more sedate than I
remembered it, more perpendicular and strait-laced, with narrower
windows and shinier woodwork, as though a coat of varnish had been
put over everything for better preservation. But, of course, fifteen
years before there had been a war going on.
Hooked.
Right at the git-go. The low-key, careful mix of memory and
observation easing me into a narrative I still had little idea where it would lead. Two paragraphs down some gentle intimation of dread
ahead:
Preserved along with it, like
stale air in an unopened room, was the well known fear which had
surrounded and filled those days, so much of it that I hadn’t even
known it was there. Because, unfamiliar with the absence of fear and
what that was like, I had not been able to identify its presence.
Looking back now across
fifteen years, I could see with great clarity the fear I had lived
in, which must mean that in the interval I had succeeded in a very
important undertaking: I must have made my escape from it.
I felt fear’s echo, and
along with that I felt the unhinged, uncontrollable joy which had
been its accompaniment and opposite face, joy which had broken out
sometimes in those days like Northern Lights across black sky.
At
this point I was a captive of the Kindle app on my laptop, interrupted only by breaks for eating and using the—as Knowles presumably would have
written—facilities. There’s a ‘50s gentility in his language,
despite it’s near-decade gain on Catcher
with its brat vernacular, somewhat shocking as I recall, in its day.
Knowles
used language to conjure atmosphere, its nuances of beauty, dread,
joy, and subtler, more civil irreverence than Caulfield’s. As to
beauty, this scene took
my breath with its quiet drama
as
well the incidental
irony of
reading
it while getting snowed-in here in Hampton Roads, Virginia:
Not
long afterward, early even for New Hampshire, snow came. It came
theatrically, late one afternoon; I looked up from my desk and saw
that suddenly there were big flakes twirling down into the
quadrangle, settling on the carefully pruned shrubbery bordering the
crosswalks, the three elms still holding many of their leaves, the
still-green lawns. They gathered there thicker by the minute, like
noiseless invaders conquering because they took possession so gently.
What
am I forgetting? Oh! Of course! Plot, character, theme, that sort of
thing! As we know, A
Separate Peace
was set against a background of World War II. Military thinking was
influencing the school to arrange its priorities to prepare teenage
boys for soldiering, toughen them up—bodies and spirit. The
principle character, Finny, in one aspect is the ideal candidate.
He’s far and away the toughest of heart, best leader, and best
athlete on campus. Problem is, he’s the worst candidate
temperamentally, taking great delight in disrespecting authority and
breaking rules. Finny’s roommate and best friend is Gene, an
introvert and the school’s best student, academically.
An
odd couple. Their mutual devotion was one leap of faith I was never
quite able to make. Much speculation has arisen over the years of a
homoerotic thing between the two. For the record, there is no sex,
described or implied, between or among any of the people in the
novel. Noted gay author David Levithan (Boy
Meets Boy)
in a retrospective to the Kindle edition, quotes a comment by Knowles
addressing this question in an interview twenty-eight years later:
“Freud said any strong relationship between two men contains a
homoerotic element. If so in this case, both characters are totally
unaware of it. It would have changed everything, it wouldn’t have
been the same story. In that time and place, my characters would have
behaved totally differently. . . . If there had been homoeroticism
between [Finny] and Gene, I would have put it in the book, I assure
you. It simply wasn’t there.”
Levithan’s own reaction
concurs with Knowles’s explanation, but he adds, “But when it
comes to what the story means to me, so much of what Knowles writes
gets to the heart of what it would have been like to be gay at that
time— and what it can still be like to be gay now.”
Perhaps
A
Separate Peace
tickled my Midwest smalltown prejudices a tad, keeping me from
engaging fully in the special friendship of Finny and Gene. I did
find the incident leading to the death of one of them the most
realistically rooted in male competitiveness, from my experience.
As
to theme, as it relates to the novel’s title, I have a quibble.
This, from one of the two protagonists, would seem to sum it up:
“I
never killed anybody and I never developed an intense level of hatred
for the enemy. Because my war ended before I ever put on a uniform; I
was on active duty all my time at school; I killed my enemy there.”
The following quote from the book seems
to challenge, I believe unintentionally, the previous notion, that
one can kill the evil in one’s heart simply by understanding it.
To me this quote is nearer the truth:
“It seemed clear that wars were not made by generations and their
special stupidities, but that wars
were made instead by something ignorant in the human heart.”
Ignorant or malignant, take
your pick. It can be tiny, almost unnoticeable, but no matter how
seemingly insignificant or how eloquently one can rationalize its
presence, it can sprout evil when the conditions are ripe, without a
moment’s warning. It’s known in criminal law as “irresistible
impulse.”
This was the unforgettable,
horrifying lesson I took from A Separate Peace.
[for
more Friday's Forgotten Books check the links on Patti
Abbott's unforgettable blog]
Mathew, I liked the passages you quoted from the novel, especially the way Knowles, who I have not read, weaves emotion into the atmospheric narrative. I found his prose clear and almost poetic.
ReplyDeleteThat's what hooked me, too, Prashant. Almost glad I didn't read it back then, as I probly wouldn't have appreciated it as much.
DeleteMathew, I enjoy your posts because they force me to think about things. I cannot say that I don't like coming-of-age novels, although I haven't read many. I read and liked Catcher in the Rye, which I must have read in my teens. And probably liked it because it was totally different from any experience I ever had.
ReplyDeleteWhat I do is avoid reading coming-of-age novels, because I think I will not like them. Same for alternate history novels. I have to force myself to read them, but when I do I generally like them.
Thanks, Tracy. I also have an aversion to alternate history novels, and cannot remember even one I've read.
DeleteJust finished it today, Mathew, and loved the prose though at times it was irritating to have long passages of description when all one wanted was action. Can't stop thinking of that impulsive act. I guess all of us have such thoughts even if we, thank God, don't always follow them up with actions.
ReplyDeleteA pleasant surprise by your visit, Neeru! I know what you mean by the sluggish passages and the discipline it takes to push thru them. Overall I enjoyed A Separate Peace. A classic. I hope you are well and enjoying this holiday season!
Delete