Wednesday, July 20, 2016

SALVATION ON SAND MOUNTAIN – Dennis Covington

Not even the foot-stompin' Charlie Daniels sound of its title or a disparaging review by Michiko Kakutani (the Don Rickles of lit'ry criticism) likely would have saved Salvation on Sand Mountain from my eternal disinterest were it not for a friend's lending it to me. And even that was a stretch, because of some doubtless twisted psychology I avoid like coiled vipers most books friends lend me. And so it was at first with Salvation on Sand Mountain. For weeks it sat atop one of my twin to-read towers—on the tower furthest from me, if it matters (and maybe in a Jungian sense it does), challenging my inertia with its Southern rock title and cover photo of a young woman. The woman is clearly beautiful despite the uncanny resemblance of her moon face to a young David Crosby's. Her striking features are distorted in a grimace that suggests erotic ecstasy as her suppliant hands appear to be offering someone a live rattlesnake.
Author Dennis Covington, who held a rattlesnake similarly in his hands while doing research for Salvation on Sand Mountain, describes the sensation:


And I could not hear the earsplitting music. The air was silent and still and filled with that strong, even light. And I realized that I, too, was fading into the white. I was losing myself by degrees, like the incredible shrinking man. The snake would be the last to go, and all I could see was the way its scales shimmered one last time in the light, and the way its head moved from side to side, searching for a way out. I knew then why handlers take up serpents. There is power in the act of disappearing; there is victory in the loss of self. It must be close to our conception of paradise, what it’s like before you’re born or after you die.

I'm thinking one of the incentives for me ultimately to pick Salvation on Sand Mountain from its tower of qued books was the same as Covington's for doing the book. Curiosity. I was looking for something to review for Patti Abbott's Friday's Forgotten Books weekly blog feature. The little I knew about religious snake handlers came from news items, usually about someone being bitten. I'd assumed the handlers were crazed in the way of youngsters playing chicken to see who is bravest. Instead of proving their bravery to each other the snake handlers ostensibly were proving their faith to an unseen god. Unhinged, as I saw it.
My curiosity grew incrementally from the book's cover, starting with the beautiful woman holding the snake. My eyes eventually drifted from her face directly across to the copper-colored seal proclaiming: National Book Award Finalist. Hmmmm, I thought. I allowed my eyes to drop beneath the photo to a blurb from The New Yorker, which praised Salvation on Sand Mountain as “An extraordinary account of how a journalistic assignment evolved into a spiritual quest.” Hmmmm, indeed. I opened the cover and read more blurbs. My favorite is from Fannie Flagg, author of Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe: Salvation, she said, “will jar you to the bone. It will make you wonder about things you never thought to wonder about and meet people you never dreamed existed. Dennis Covington is either the bravest or the craziest journalist I know.”

Dennis Covington

Well, as you might guess, I now concur. With all of it. As the Newsweek blurb promised, Salvation on Sand Mountain mesmerized me. Mesmerized me like a swami's flute summoning a cobra from its basket. I read the book in one sitting, and remained entranced through to the end. Unlike Covington, though, I was not compelled to visit a snake handling church and hoist a rattlesnake barehanded over my head. Not that I have a phobic fear of snakes, like my mother, who faced her fear by boiling a harmless grass snake, stripping the flesh from its bones, and fashioning the skeleton into a necklace. It didn't help her much with live snakes, but I'm certain the courage it revealed stood her well with her siblings growing up on the farm. I learned I did not inherit her phobia when I felt no qualms wrestling Miles the five-foot-long black rat snake from our chicken coop and carrying him back to the woods every other week or so. I demurred a similar response when it came to the mid-size copperhead, for the same reason Covington gives in his book, because it was on our property endangering our children and pets.
Copperhead and I
 
An assignment for The New York Times prompted Covington's journey to Sand Mountain. Reporting on the trial of a fundamentalist preacher in Scottsboro, Alabama, charged with attempting to murder his wife with rattlesnakes, he became fascinated with the people testifying about snake handling in their worship services. Covington grew up a Baptist in Birmingham, but quickly understood he was glimpsing a part of Southern culture alien to him. With the curiosity of a journalist and a taste for danger—he'd covered war on the ground in El Salvador—he plunged in head first. He learned his ancestors had been mountain people, one of them a snake-handling preacher. His curiosity moved him beyond getting a story to finding deeper cultural roots and religious faith within himself.
I shall leave off now, as it seems the enchantment Salvation on Sand Mountain cast on me is enjoying a revival of sorts. Afraid if I keep going I just might abruptly stand, throw my arms in the air and shout “AMEN!” And I would mean it. Not the most prudent behavior, I suspect, in our public library.

[for more Friday's Forgotten Books see the listing on Patti Abbott's unforgettable blog]


Thursday, July 14, 2016

THE BEST OF MURRAY LEINSTER – edited by J.J. Pierce


The irony seems too salient still, me backing away from an obvious science fiction situation and bumping into Murray Leinster, known widely at one time as the Dean of Science Fiction. But, with a touch of Leinster license here and there, that is precisely what happened.
Murray Leinster

The sequence began about a week before the laptop screen went black. I'd undoubtedly annoyed the Collective Cyber Consciousness (as Leinster would have called it) by doing something so stupid to my primary laptop it forced me back to my backup laptop while the primary was in the shop getting a new power board. It was the backup that went black. Clearly a CCC reminder for me to try harder not to do stupid things to a member of the cyber community. (I've just now noticed a recurrence thus far in this report of the letter sequence a-c-k. In the interest of full disclosure, I have no idea what it means. Back to the report:)

The second shoe dropping in the reminder sequence occurred at my usual spot in the Virginia Room of our public library. Unbeknownst to me my chair was less than a three-step roll from the shelf that holds the library's donated row of Murray Leinster paperbacks. Instead of rolling, however, after it became apparent my laptop's screen was black for good, I stood, stretched and began searching for something to read. The row of Leinster paperbacks immediately caught my eye. I knew immediately why they were there. Not long after I'd moved to Gloucester County, Va. (1978) I read a piece in the local bi-monthly paper that Leinster (whom I'd not heard of and who was known locally by his real name, William Fitzgerald Jenkins) had some connection to Gloucester. In addition, he sounded like an interesting guy.

I confess to not having been a fan of science fiction over the years. I'd read a few novels and stories and enjoyed them. Found them fascinating, in fact. Yet, for some reason beyond my grasp the genre itself eluded my interest. This exposed me to the eventual embarrassment in a writing group of being caught using the abbreviation sci-fi, which immediately alerted cognoscenti, provoking metaphorical raised eyebrows and sidelong glances. A friend patiently explained that the ignominy of this appellation sprouted from ignorant movie critics' references to superficial treatments of the literary form, and that sf is acceptable but more so as an abbreviation for speculative than science fiction. Already an initiate when I spotted the row of books behind my chair and plucked for perusal The Best of Murray Leinster, I was pleased to see John J. Pierce using sf in his introduction to the anthology, which he had edited. This lent, I now knew, a particular authority to his stewardship.


I stood in front of the bookshelf reading Pierce's introduction, slowly becoming aware of the true reason the Collective Cyber Consciousness was messing with me. He (she?) was giving me an undeniably special introduction at long last to the Dean--alas too late for an earthly meeting, as Leinster died in 1975. I turned, entranced, and, book in hand, initiated the first of the three steps back to my table to start reading what Pierce assured me were Leinster's groundbreaking stories. As I lifted my foot to begin the second step I sensed the presence of a tall, elegant, honey-blond in the open doorway. I tore my attention from the paperback, looked up and smiled. She was smiling too, but not at me.

That's Granddad's book!” The honey-hued voice, with its three-word message, brought everything together as neatly as an sf-inspired cosmic convergence.

Murray Leinster's granddaughter was on her way to a meeting and hadn't the time to chat, but I learned in that brief celestial moment his grave was a scant five minutes down the road. My first impulse was to drive there at once. I squelched the urge. I needed to read a little Leinster before venturing to the churchyard. This I did.



A couple of days later found me standing before the modest headstone marking the resting place of William F. Jenkins and his wife Mary. It was sunny and a tad too warm, but a cooling breeze played through the leafy oaks and tulip poplars where singing birds entertained one another and all who cared to hear them. The birds and the trees and the frisky breeze seemed in concert to summon a spirit of wary innocence and brave hope, the very sense that inhabits an imagined meeting in deep space of the advance scouting teams of two mutually alien civilizations. Their ships stop, facing each other, near enough that a push of a button by either could destroy the opposing ship. Their crews figure out a way to communicate their intentions. Both claim they want the inadvertent meeting to end peacefully, while recognizing the inherent danger in trust. Each just might have in mind to follow the other back to its home planet, perhaps to destroy its inhabitants. There's really no way to know. The classic stalemate.

As I gazed at the grave of the man who solved this dilemma in 1945, fifty-one years before the story in which he solved it—First Contact—finally won a Hugo Award (one of the most coveted honors society can bestow upon a writer) I felt a tremor ripple through my nervous system. A chill, it seemed at first. But no, I don't think it was that. No mere chill. Something more.



[for more Friday's Forgotten Books see the listing on Patti Abbott's unforgettable blog]






 

Tuesday, July 5, 2016

THE DOORBELL RANG – Rex Stout

I made one mistake, as Archie Goodwin might have said. To himself, of course, never to his boss—at least not without putting an ironic spin on it in the hope of being sufficiently artful to mitigate his shame with an ambiguous grunt from Nero Wolfe instead of Wolfe's otherwise definitive pfui. As I have already admitted to you straight out I made the mistake it would be folly for me to try to put any sort of spin on it so I shan't, as, again, Goodwin might have put it.

My mistake? I picked the wrong mystery to read for Rex Stout Week on Patti Abbott's Friday's Forgotten Books blog feature. Oh, the one I read was a Rex Stout mystery alright—Over My Dead Body—and it was a good one. Just the wrong one, which I discovered afterward while reading some bio information on Mr. Stout. What I learned was that of the seventy-some mysteries featuring Goodwin and Wolfe (he wrote others, as well, in his prolific career) the one I should have picked for Rex Stout Week was his most controversial. Here's what Wiki says about it:
Stout was one of many American writers closely watched by J. Edgar Hoover's FBI. Hoover considered him an enemy of the bureau and either a Communist or a tool of Communist-dominated groups. Stout's leadership of the Authors League of America during the McCarthy era was particularly irksome to the FBI. About a third of Stout's FBI file is devoted to his 1965 novel The Doorbell Rang.
Rex Stout 1931

Perhaps you can understand my explosive “pfui!” when I read that last sentence. Wouldn't anyone have uttered such an expletive combining surprise and total disgust had they been in my place? Having just finished reading a Rex Stout mystery other than The Doorbell Rang for a special occasion without first having read the bio? Who among you reading this now would not immediately have fetched and devoured The Doorbell Rang to learn what all the hoohah had been about? Be honest now! Anyway, that's precisely what I did, and it is why you are reading this flummery instead of some other about Over My Dead Body, which, as I've mentioned, is also good. Damned good, if you will. I have yet to read a Rex Stout mystery that isn't.
So what can I tell you about The Doorbell Rang you might not already have guessed just knowing it irked the FBI, that obviously Wolfe and Goodwin deeply irk the fictional FBI and, in particular the man all special agents were known in real life to refer to in hushed tones as The Director? Consider this exchange between Goodwin and Wolfe's gourmet chef, Fritz Brenner:


I picked up the fork. “You know what the FBI is.”
But certainly. Mr. Hoover.”
That’s what he thinks. On behalf of a client we’re going to push his nose in. Just a routine chore, but he’s touchy and will try to stop us. So futile.” I put a bite of cake where it belonged.
But he—he’s a great man. Yes?”
Sure. But I suppose you’ve seen pictures of him.”
Yes.”
What do you think of his nose?”
Not good. Not exactly Ă©patĂ©, but broad. Not bien fait.”
Then it should be pushed,” I forked sausage.


Rex Stout didn't just push noses in his novels. During World War II he wrote anti-Nazi propaganda and conducted more than 60 broadcasts on a CBS program called Our Secret Weapon. After the war he was active in a group called United World Federalists, drawing the ire of Martin Dies, chairman of the House Un-American Activities Committee. After Dies called him a Communist, Stout is said to have responded, "I hate Communists as much as you do, Martin, but there's one difference between us. I know what a Communist is and you don't."
Rex Stout 1975
The title. Your curiosity would not be untoward to wonder what in hell it means. I can tell you this: it, the title, comprises the very last sentence in The Doorbell Rang. Neither my nose nor imagination was pushed the least little bit to deduce, with undoubtedly startling accuracy, who did the ringing. So, I daresay, with yours.
Speaking of noses, I've gone and poked mine into The Doorbell Rang's only one-star Amazon “reader review,” which says simply, “I [sic] childish screed against the FBI. Typical liberal crap. Stout must have been senile.”
Clicking on the reviewer's name, Frank J. Habic, of Osprey, Florida, I learned this was the only review Amazon has credited to Mr. Habic for anything, ever. I left a tongue-in-cheek comment saying, “You forgot to add 'Special Agent (ret.)' to your name.” I posted the comment yesterday, and immediately began keeping an eye out for ensembles of fedoras, dark glasses, cheap suits, and shiny black shoes.

[for more Friday's Forgotten Books see the listing on Patti Abbott's unforgettable blog]

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

WALTZING COWBOYS – Sarah Collins Honenberger


I always make it a point to buy at least one book at book signings where I'm also pushing product. My motives are mixed. I joke that it's like priming a pump. I buy one of yours and you reciprocate. I did this at my first signing, with three other authors, and ended up spending more than I made even though the reciprocal theory bore some return. But it was in December and the books I bought were gifts--signed gifts, at that--which took care of the bulk of my Christmas shopping.

My most recent signing featured seven authors, too many to engage the reciprocal ploy without depleting my bank account even if my purchases generated any sales of mine. I bought one book, figuring it might start a rush to my table. It didn't, although I managed to sell one to a walk-in customer.
Deciding which book to buy was the rub. Cramped for space in the small store, I was positioned on the second-floor landing between two "Jessica Fletchers" who'd already each published several dozen of the kind of mysteries known as "cozies," which are distinguished from "hard boiled" mysteries at first sight by their titles and cover art suggesting a dearth of on-page violence. I wasn't in the market for a cozy. A third author, one of the four on the ground floor, was also peddling cozies.
I should note that had any of the three cozy authors bought one or both of my books I'd have reciprocated. It's the way I roll. But they didn't so I rolled on by. Two of the others had books I'd bought the previous year. This left Sarah Collins Honenberger. I almost rolled by her, too, as her books looked literary and I rarely buy literary without a proper introduction.
Yet, here we were, standing near one another in a small bookstore with her three novels arranged unpretentiously on a small table. She seemed relaxed and friendly. I politely asked her about her books and she talked about them enthusiastically but without any huckster's hype. Her sales savvy nonetheless zeroed in on the book she sensed most interested me--Waltzing Cowboys. I thought at first it might be a Brokeback Mountain-type story, but I didn't say this. She told me it was about an old cowboy who goes to New York to find the son he'd abandoned decades earlier.
Possibly without realizing it, although I suspect she sensed this somehow, too, she mentioned she saw the story as perfect for a movie starring my favorite actor.
"A friend of mine in L.A. knows Robert socially. I'm hoping she'll show it to him." She tried to restrain the excitement in her voice, but I picked up on it. It blossomed full blown when she saw she'd struck pay dirt with me.
Sarah Collins Honenberger
I finished the book last night. A good read. Literary, oh yes, but a fascinating story and well-crafted, leaving me hungry for what takes place after the book ends. I'd buy the sequel in a New York minute. And, yes, Honenberger was right, Waltzing Cowboys is perfect for Robert Duvall.
So who does the waltzing? Would this be a movie Donald Trump might find excuses to avoid--or attend wearing an elaborate disguise, were that even possible? Perhaps the latter should the Orange One's, um, curiosity be aroused by the thought of the delicate dance cowboys and untamed horses do before they feel comfortable with each other. This occurs in beautifully intimate detail in the first chapter, which Honenberger had entered in a short story contest several years earlier, winning first place.
"Rhue's prairie dance with Delilah stood on its own as a story until [the cowboy's] past in New York City rose up like a ghostly mourner from Vince's funeral and begged me to explore Ford's life without a father," she writes in the book's acknowledgments. Waltzing Cowboys was the thoughtful, literary and deeply entertaining result.

[find more Friday's Forgotten Books reviewed at Todd Mason's amazingly eclectic blog:

Monday, June 27, 2016

True LuooOOuve

All you need is love, sing the idealists, their beatific smiles aimed skyward. The flip side gives us love stinks, presumably calling out lust gone south. My dad the cynic loved to sneer at young love. “Oh, of course, they're in luff,” his exaggerated elevation of eyebrows and ugly oral rictus conveying sarcasm whenever romance was given as the excuse for misfortune. Male suitors were “Airedales.” He didn't have a slur for horny women, other than “easy.” I resented his attitude then, but know now he was probably mostly right. This is probably why most movies and songs that portray, even clumsily, expressions meant to represent true love invariably turn my eyes into salty potted plant sprinklers.
Cynics are said to be disappointed romantics, and I can't disagree. Conditioned by my dad, who spoke with unwitting self-description, and by my mother, whose romantic nature survived the battering of her husband's bitterness, I've evolved with qualities of both extremes. This means I can still recognize and believe in true love, and when I do it leaves me agape. I weep when the ideal is portrayed by singers and actors—even cartoon characters--but they're tension tears because I know I'm suspending my sadly conditioned disbelief for a fantasy ride. I weep for what I wish with my heart to be real, knowing most often, too too often, it is not. But when I see it for real, the jaw drops, the heart slows and a warm glow fills my being. I may weep then, as well, but the tears come more slowly and from somewhere deep. I weep for real when I read stories documenting parents' unconditional love for their children. Even my dad would have recognized this as the real thing. I haven't wept yet for the Olivers, but I suspect those tears are coming.
I think the reason I didn't flee NPR the other day when Edgar Oliver's performance at The Moth of his piece Apron Strings of Savannah started playing was that I sensed something more profound than the grostesquely Poe-ish recounting of the Addams Family childhood of Oliver, his sister Helen and their spooky childlike mother, whom he called only “Mother.” Oliver's delivery was in a voice and speaking manner that's an offspring of Peter Lorre and Boris Karloff. “Mothhhhher would place a folding chair under the front dooOOoorknob and...hahaha...drape a leather belt with camel beEEells over the chair, thinking, I suppose that the beEEells would alarrum us if buUOorglars would try to break in...hahahaha...”
I was in my pickup truck running chores when this came on. My first reaction was disbelief, which quickly segued into skeptical amazement and before long, with jaw hanging helplessly, I was transfixed. When the performance ended, the Moth's artistic director, Catherine Burns, interviewed Oliver about his voice and his speaking manner, which were identical to the performance. His older sister, Helen, taught him to speak this way, he said, noting that she speaks the same way. His mother, he said, spoke like “a little girl.”
As he concludes his performance, Oliver describes how he and Helen sneak out of the house at night and escape to Paris. Their mother comes off as a formidable villain in all of this. Yet, Oliver, while delighting in pointing out her nuttiness, does so with a certain unshakable affection. There is no sarcasm, no bitterness that he and his sister were raised in such a weird and isolating fashion by a woman who clearly was daft as a loon. Oliver does not mention that she joined them eventually in Paris, but a photo on The Moth's website shows the three of them sitting in a Paris cafe on a rainy day. Their mother and Oliver are gazing at each other in a manner that bespeaks a deep, unsullied devotion. She is beautiful and appears young enough to be his sister. The three of them exude health and merriment and, what the hell, love.

Helen, Mother, Edgar -- in Paris



Promotion for Helen & Edgar biop – http://www.helenandedgar.com/



Thursday, June 23, 2016

SHOT IN DETROIT – Patricia Abbott


I rarely abandon a novel once I've started it. There have been some—Moby Dick and Gravity's Rainbow come to mind—I've needed several false starts before getting up enough traction or momentum to finally read to the end. Most recently I gave up on a debut novel by a brilliant writer I won't name whose narrator is a serial killer sexually aroused by his murders. Creeped me out, and I doubt I will ever come back to it. Squeamish, some might say, but I prefer “humanely sensitive.” I can't help identifying with compelling characters in novels, and there are some I just cannot abide.
Violet Hart, the narrator in Patricia Abbott's new novel, Shot in Detroit,
seemed at first to be one of these. Hart is an artist obsessed with taking photographs of dead young black men in their coffins. Knowing this I might never have started the book had the author been someone other than Abbott. Even then I hesitated a tad, even still savoring her debut novel, Concrete Angel, which has lit up the crime-fiction community to rave reviews and awards. I've lived long enough to have come to terms with death—of family and friends, natural and violent--and have reached an albeit edgy peace with the inevitability of my own demise, not unreasonably distant down that road we're told we all eventually must walk alone. At the same time morbidity continues to put me off. Grateful Dead to me is the name of a band. It might mean more to some, but not me--I hear the rippling intro to Truckin'. I feel obliged to focus my attention on the potential for growth the statistically brief time left to me has in store. Better busy being born than busy dying, as Bob Dylan sagely advised.
So wouldn't you know, several chapters in, Shot in Detroit started giving me the same creepy feeling I got from the other novel, the one with the sexual fetish serial killer narrator I abandoned. And I wasn't much liking Violet Hart, who seemed a calloused young woman who put her art above all else. She has a mirror on the ceiling above her bed for added dimension to her trysts, which to her seem to have little more significance than carnal quality. But more than not liking her, I wasn't liking what she was doing, taking photos of dead bodies in coffins. It didn't help that she was taking great pains, artistic pains, to preserve these young men in images that greatly interested the owner of a gallery who wanted to feature them in a showing. I found this disturbing, and so did Hart's boyfriend, the mortician who had unintentionally sparked her obsession and, although allowing her to shoot the photos at his funeral home, was growing uneasy about her project.
Patricia Abbott
Something kept me on track, though. Abbott's skill with characters, bringing them alive with yearnings and fears, weaknesses, and strengths, has a way of winning you over, infiltrating your defenses. You start feeling friendly, no matter what they're up to. You sort of want to have their back, help them when they're in a jam. It was Father's Day when I read Shot in Detroit. My own daughter is in Los Angeles, a struggling actress. I'm in Virginia. I worry about her out there. As I read Violet Hart's unsettling narrative I began to wonder why Sarah hadn't called me yet. My paternal instincts were kicking in. They bled unto the pages I was reading.
Soon I was Violet's dad. Her own father had abandoned the family shortly after she was born. Her story was drawing me in as his surrogate. “Stop with this thing about dead bodies,” I more than once almost hollered. “Keep your mouth shut,” I snapped silently while police detectives interrogated her as a suspect in the violent deaths of a couple of young men she knew. I offered unspoken sympathy and gentle advice during her interior monologues when she worried about her decisions and the course her life was taking. “No!!” I'm afraid I might have shouted out loud when it seemed the unthinkable had just happened.
So did I finish Shot in Detroit? Would I have written this review if I hadn't? (I don't review books I've abandoned, even to pan what I've read of them.) Did I like Shot in Detroit? Yes. Speak up, I can't hear you. YES, DAMMIT, I LOVED IT!! Thanks. Oh, did my daughter call? C'mon, you want me to spoil the ending?

Click on any of the links below to buy Shot in Detroit: