I
might never have read the startlingly good short novel The
Dig had a poet friend whose eclectic
tastes I respect but don’t always share not recommended it. I still
might not have read it had she spoken in the same breath—as well
she might have--“Cormac McCarthy”, a name that has irritated me
ever since I read enough of Blood Meridian to hear in the
author’s self-consciously poetic voice an unmistakable celebration
of cynicism that made me want to dash a glass of cheap beer in what I
imagined to be his smug face.
It didn’t help to know of his
brilliant success, which for me elevates nothing more than my
ordinarily healthy blood pressure. Had I a lawn and saw him on it I’d
grab my 12-gauge and order him off. But enough of him whom I would
name only a pet vulture after. We’re here to talk about The Dig.
Despite critics comparing its writing to that of the aforementioned
vulture’s namesake, I would read anything Cynan Jones wrote.
This
young Welsh author seduced me at The Dig’s get-go. I came
near to short-circuiting my laptop with drool (that’s hyperbole,
for which I apologize, recognizing the need to calm down a tad before
my blog administrator pulls the plug on this report). Jones seduced
me even before I reached the following description, which some
reviewers cite in their comparison with...the other:
He was a gruff and big man and when he got from the van it lifted
and relaxed like a child relieved of the momentary fear of being hit.
Where he went he brought a sense of harmfulness and it was as if this
was known even by the inanimate things about him. They feared him
somehow.
He opened the back of the van and the wire inside the window
clattered and he reached for the sack and dropped the badger out. He
spat into the dirty tarmac beside it.
The dogs had pulled the front of its face off and its nose hung
loose and bloodied, hanging from a sock of skin. It hung off the
badger like a separate animal.
Ag, he thought. The crows will sort that.
Were
The Dig to continue in this
vein, with “the big man” (we’re never given a name) carrying
the entire weight in a saga of cruel, earthy brutality, the polite
faint praise I’d have felt compelled to offer likely would have
strained my friendship with the poet (one avoids outright dishonesty
in literary relationships of this nature, and snarling or shouting
discourse is unthinkable except perhaps when either or both parties
are hearing impaired). It was our good fortune the other
weight-bearing character is farmer Daniel, a decent fellow mourning
the violent death of his wife, obviating any need to ponder those
scenarios.
TBM
and Daniel live near each other in a rural Welsh community, but they
apparently have never met. Yet their lives, different as can be,
appear on a collision course. Both men live alone, although Daniel
feels a constant presence of the wife he lost recently when a horse
kicked her head. TBM makes his living with his dogs, exterminating
rats for farmers by day, and, by night, illegally digging up badgers
from their burrows to sell to gamblers who pit them against dogs. We
find Daniel birthing lambs by hand, an exhausting and occasionally
heartbreaking job especially with the ever-present grief for his
wife.
Scouting
the countryside with his map of badger “setts” (burrows), TBM
sees Daniel’s farm as a good prospect for his next dig:
The first sett he had in mind was too close to outbuildings with
men and dogs he did not know. This might be the place.
He’s weak, the big man thought. He’s weak and he is a farmer
by himself. He will be occupied. News spread out here, soaked out,
and he knew about the loss of Daniel’s wife and why he was at the
graveyard. He’s trying to get through on his own.
He knew the setts locally and knew that this sett was relatively
distant from the house of the farm. It was walkable from his own
place. It’s the one, he said to himself. A man on his own, what can
he do?
It’s
a setup crying out for the Peckinpah treatment:
Borgnine as TBM, of course, and Hoffman as Daniel with Eva Marie
Saint in the ghostly flashbacks. Alas, Rin Tin Tin and Lassie are
obliged to sit this one out.
Facetious again, a tic I’ve acquired to protect my manly cover
sometimes in the presence of beauty and elegance. The writing, oh,
the writing, the story. The setting. Hemingway came immediately to
mind as I marveled at the spare perfection of Jones’s word choices
and his pacing and tone. Then I started thinking. Much of Hemingway’s
pared-down prose and structure betray a studied dramatic air. In its
time, this was new and different and it dazzled. Today it stands out
a tad threadbare.
None
of that in The
Dig.
It’s simple reality, stark naked humanity, this alone.
[find
more Friday's Forgotten Books links at Todd Mason's amazingly
eclectic blog:
No, not for me, Mathew. I've become squeamish in my old age and don't like reading about hunting or cruelty to animals - don't care how good the writing. Plus I like badgers. More likely a manly sort of book and you know what I've been reading lately, so I'm disinclined to be open-minded. At least for the time being. :)
ReplyDeleteP.S. I'm also not inclined to read Cormac McCarthy either.
At least we agree on McCarthy, Yvette! I probably should have emphasized with more detail the difference I found between the two (altho admittedly I have not read more than a few pages of Blood Meridian), that the violence of The Big Man is balanced beautifully by the compassion and courage of Daniel. The overall effect of The Dig is by no means the celebration of brutality that it's my impression most if not all of McCarthy's work entails (and I might be wrong about McCarthy, but from the voice in BM and the film depictions of The Road and No Country for Old Men I think I have him figured right.)
ReplyDeleteI am afraid I might be too squeamish to read this one too, Mathew, like Yvette. It does sound like a good book overall, and maybe someday I will give it a try.
ReplyDeleteI understand, Tracy. It's pretty earthy, something I ordinarily have little taste for. But the writing is so exceptional. That's what sold it for me.
Delete