My librarian friend Angie shared an article
on Facebook decrying our frightening decline in reading, and its
effect on our elections. Introducing the article, Angie posed the
question, “What one book do you think everyone should read at least
once?”
Picked your book yet? You know which one I chose. After scanning in
my head many of the books you likely are considering yourself at this
moment, Fahrenheit
451 seemed so obvious when my scan
reached it that my brain pushed select and I proceeded with no
more ado.
It was high time, too, as, unthinkable though it may be of
a lifelong avid reader, I’d not yet opened the cover of the 1953
science fiction classic about a dystopian future where books—any
books—were illegal. So illegal, they were, that fire departments
comprised, instead of firefighters, firestarters.
The alarms they raced to answer in their kerosene-laden trucks were
called in by people reporting a suspicion that books were at a
particular address. The books were burned at the scene, usually along
with the building and, on at least one occasion, the building’s
book-hoarding occupant.
I’d always been aware of Fahrenheit 451’s
book-burning theme as well as the title’s significance (the
supposed temperature at which books ignite). Maybe the idea was too
distressing to wish to read a story about it. Then there was the
science fiction factor, a category that’s never generated much
enthusiasm in me. I avoided the movie as well, despite a lifelong
infatuation with Julie Christie and an abiding admiration of Oscar
Werner’s talent. But now, suddenly, confronted with friend Angie’s
incendiary question, the obstacles were gone. I knew it was time.
What I hadn’t expected, at least not consciously, was the startling
knockout timeliness of Fahrenheit 451. This, for example, as
Faber, the old professor, reminds Montag, the rebel fireman, how
their nightmare state came about:
Remember, the firemen are rarely necessary. The public itself
stopped reading of its own accord. You firemen provide a circus now
and then at which buildings are set off and crowds gather for the
pretty blaze, but it’s a small sideshow indeed, and hardly
necessary to keep things in line… People are having fun.”
I remember the newspapers
dying like huge moths. No one wanted them back. No one missed them.
And then the Government, seeing how advantageous it was to have
people reading only about passionate lips and the fist in the
stomach, circled the situation with your fire-eaters.
And this:
“So now do you see why
books are hated and feared? They show the pores in the face of life.
The comfortable people want only wax moon faces, poreless, hairless,
expressionless.
I
might have gasped, aloud, reading those passages, apprehending their
electric immediacy, their awful insidious currency. I gape anew with
each reading, yet, though written more than half a century ago! The
fateful trend toward passive consumerism and ultimate illiteracy is
malignantly alive and thriving. I’m wondering now if my reluctance
to read Fahrenheit
451
over the decades since it first appeared was more a response to a
chilling subconscious intimation, from its theme alone, that Ray
Bradbury had done something much more important than merely write an
alarming novel, that he in fact had divined a prophesy.
Bradbury’s
narrative, besides its philosophical insight and lyricism, is what
today’s publishing marketers call “a thriller” or “suspense”.
Fahrenheit
451
is both. Montag gradually metamorphizes into all-out rebellion,
sparked by a teenage neighbor girl whose family has not succumbed to
the prevailing herd mentality Faber characterizes as “the most
dangerous enemy to truth and freedom, the solid unmoving cattle of
the majority. Oh, God, the terrible tyranny of the majority.” The
rebel fireman eventually finds himself the object of a nail-biting
chase involving swarms of helicopters and a relentless mechanical
hound with eight legs, a cruelly efficient computer brain and a
retractable needle that injects poison into its captives.
Montag takes up with an
underground band of former literature professors who avoid cities and
travel by night. They’ve devoted themselves to memorizing great
works of literature in the event some day humanity will want to
remember its roots. “Some day, some year, the books can be written
again,” one of his fellow fugitives tells him, “The people will
be called in, one by one, to recite what they know and we’ll set it
up in type until another Dark Age, when we might have to do the whole
damn thing over again. But that’s the wonderful thing about man; he
never gets so discouraged or disgusted that he gives up doing it all
over again, because he knows very well it is important and worth the
doing.”
So,
after finally reading Fahrenheit
451,
would I recommend it as “the one book everyone should read at least
once?” Well, I’m
sure glad I did. Thanks for the prompt, Angie!
I've read it twice, both times long ago. Perhaps it's time for another re-reading.
ReplyDeleteI'm surprised it wasn't required in high school, not to mention college. Time to see the movie now, too.
DeleteI have read Fahrenheit 451 but it was so long ago I remember very little. It is on my list of Classic novels to read "soon."
ReplyDeleteI can never think of an answer to that type of question. My husband's suggestion would be Bleak House by Dickens, although he would be reluctant to come up with something that suits everyone. It is a very interesting question.
It bothered me, too, Tracy, but in this context I figured something that pointed directly to the value of books themselves was the way to go. Almost at that instant Fahrenheit 451 burst into flames in my mind.
DeleteI too read it a million years ago, Mathew. (Maybe for school.) Needless to say, it is mostly erased from my memory. Nor do I remember seeing the movie at all. However, I do remember the people who memorized the classics (just in case) and that always seemed to me to be a very noble thing.
ReplyDeleteVery noble, Yvette! I can't even memorize little poems I write.
Delete