Allowing
that Shakespeare earned a karmic pass to choose the timing and form
of his next incarnation for one last shot at giving posterity
the definitive
romantic tragedy it hungers for, he (or she), might
well
call the new play Henry
and Clara.
A
bunch of reasons can
be listed to
celebrate this cosmic opportunity, beginning with the thrilling
challenge to dance along a tightwire of tragic romance sans the
safety net of a "wherefore art thou" in any
scene. Sourcewise? 'Tis the refreshed Bard's good fortune to find
Arthur Brooke, whose poem inspired the Romeo/Juliet attempt, also
returned to corporeal life, this time as Thomas Mallon, distinguished
writer of historical fiction and author of the eponymous 1994 novel
we're reprising here.
Exciting to
know the presumed Mallon/Bard collaboration will finally attain those
critical epic-story elements lacking in the provincial (while
admittedly popular) effort to capture the consummate tragic magnitude
our graduate seminars will require in coming centuries. At first
blush these new elements might appear countereffective,
diminishing
the dramatic essentials of an archetypal doomed romance. A second
blush reveals
these crucial elements in Henry
and Clara
drawing
their more compelling power from a subtle intimacy not found in the
16th
century
Globe Theatre
production.
No warring
families. Instead, the dramatic tension emerges within one, the union
of two separate families each bringing children—one group having
lost their mother, the other their father. The doomed couple meet as
youngsters when their families are joined:
Clara Harris is ten, Henry Rathbone, seven. Immediately taken with
each other, the two grow in mutual affection as they grow in
maturity. Their socially prominent parents' concern rises
commensurately as the closeness of the step-siblings moves beyond
acceptable norms to talk of marriage.
Henry |
The
prospective
play
has also a grander backdrop than the Globe version. Enter stage left,
and right, tossing all up in the air:
Abraham Lincoln, and war!
By then the
couple, in their twenties—Clara nearing thirty—have become
lovers, but her father withholds his blessing, delaying their
marriage until “after the war.” Ira Harris is a U.S. Senator by now, his daughter the First Lady's confidante. Henry and Clara's
romance during the war years proceeds mostly in the many letters
between them. Henry, an Army officer, returns to the capital wounded
and deeply traumatized by his participation in the catastrophic
Battle of the Crater near Petersburg, Va.
Clara |
The war is
all but officially over April 15,
1865
when Henry suffers a second trauma, this one shared intimately by
Clara and, indelibly, by history. They are guests of President
Lincoln and his wife in their box at Ford's Theater the night an
assassin's bullet takes
Lincoln's life and Henry's sanity. Mallon gives us the lovers'
palpable accounts of what happened. Here's Clara's:
Clara felt
the muscles of her arms jump inside their puffed sleeves. A trap door
must have been sprung onstage, a play on “man-trap.” The loud
crack was some bit of stage business, like this burst of blue smoke
she could see and smell. But that had to be wrong, she realized,
turning left in her seat: the smoke was behind her. The box was
filled with it, and before she could turn far enough to see Henry,
she realized that he was on his feet, along with another man who was
now in the box, whose face she couldn’t see behind the smoke. There
was a gleam, which she suddenly recognized as the long silver blade
of a knife. The faceless man was plunging it into Henry.
Henry's
wound is
severe. Veins, nerves,
and an artery slashed along an arm from the elbow nearly to the
shoulder. The painful physical wound
eventually
heals,
but the deeper wound to his mind worsens.
The conflict within him, between disdain for the war and excitement
in battle, is
as fascinating to track as the war itself. Hoping sex might help heal
him,
Clara takes him to bed, recalling in her own mind their first time
together at a friend's studio in Paris, which bound them sublimely as
if in marriage:
He
had worried about the war unleashing all his pent-up anger, but now
it seemed as if the war had muffled him to the point of death. As she
pulled down the blankets, she imagined herself fanning the last bit
of a fire that threatened to go out and leave her frozen. She got
into the bed and pulled him toward her, coaxed the lightning down
once more. He climbed in beside her and rested his head against her
neck. She waited for his whiskers to move, for the rhythm to start;
she made an urgent humming sound, and still she waited, until she
realized he’d gone to sleep. She stroked the back of his head,
smoothed his hair, frustrated and more worried than before, but
determined that he would at least have a deep rest. She smoothed and
stroked, again and again, until she herself was nearly asleep. Her
eyes opened in the darkness at the sound of a song, something low and
moaning. He sounded like a Negro, singing into the pillow, his throat
vibrating against her shoulder:
“We
looks like men marchin’ on / We looks like men o’war!”
Despite
Henry's deterioration and a warning to her from his dying
cousin--“Don’t,
Clara,” he gasped, making her think she’d hurt him. She gently
laid him back down against the pillow, but even when he was free from
her grasp, he groaned, “Don’t. Don’t go through with it. For
your sake, not for mine.”--they
eventually marry.
The cousin, Howard, had professed his love for her, and at one point,
with Henry long absent in the war and Howard home convalescing from a
recurring illness, Clara does
ponder choosing Howard over her beloved Henry:
...she
allowed herself to imagine Howard, and the charms of his equanimity.
He could not have written the letters tied up in mauve ribbon and
lying on her night table. If he, instead of Henry, were with the
Twelfth, and writing her from all the places the regiment had fought
its way through in the past fifteen months — Fredericksburg,
Chancellorsville, Bristoe, and beyond — the stack would contain
good-humored dismissals of all the hardships and fears he was
enduring. As it was, coming from Henry’s pen, they were full of
exciting alternations: exhilaration by gunfire one week, a fearful
reappraisal of that same exhilaration the next, followed by a
heart-rending denunciation of the war itself, a plague on both the
houses fighting it. Howard’s letters would have been soothing and
soft, so soft she would probably have slept with them under her
pillow. But Henry’s, there on the night table, seemed to glow, like
foxfire in a forest.
The
ending, of course, is pure Shakesperean tragedy, and as we know how
bloody the Bard can be in such scenes, this report shall leave
your
imagination to play with the possibilities until you read Mallon's
book
yourself. Another telling advantage Henry
and Clara
has over Romeo
and Juliet
is in
its
plot development.
No need for the clever twists and turns fiction authors invent for
suspense and amusement. Mallon's
woven this story
around
what he calls a scaffold
built of documention:
“...substantial
in places, almost entirely lacking in others...and
the reader should know that I have taken liberal advantage of the
elbow room between that scaffold’s girders and joists. The
narrative...is a work of inference, speculation, and outright
invention.”
Mallon's
modesty aside, his melding of records and imagination provides a
tapestry so seamless its authority is implicit. Its haunting effect,
amplified by intricate, viable detail of environment and
personalities, has settled so deeply within me I cannot recall a
similar reading experience that's
affected
me so. And the epilogue. Oh, mercy!
[Find
more Friday's Forgotten Books links at Todd
Mason's amazingly eclectic blog]
That is a piece of history I did not know about at all. History and geography are the topics I am very lacking in. Sounds very sad but I am sure it would be worth the read.
ReplyDeleteI think you would enjoy it, Tracy, despite the sadness. It affected me deeply when I first read it, soon after it came out. A powerful story.
Delete